public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Yumei Huang <yuhuang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sbrivio@redhat.com,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, justin.iurman@uliege.be,
	shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: preserve insertion order for same-scope addresses
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 01:00:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176774760977.2183630.3799089848817482368.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260104032357.38555-1-yuhuang@redhat.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Sun,  4 Jan 2026 11:23:57 +0800 you wrote:
> IPv6 addresses with the same scope are returned in reverse insertion
> order, unlike IPv4. For example, when adding a -> b -> c, the list is
> reported as c -> b -> a, while IPv4 preserves the original order.
> 
> This behavior causes:
> 
> a. When using `ip -6 a save` and `ip -6 a restore`, addresses are restored
>    in the opposite order from which they were saved. See example below
>    showing addresses added as 1::1, 1::2, 1::3 but displayed and saved
>    in reverse order.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v2] ipv6: preserve insertion order for same-scope addresses
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cb3de96eea66

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-07  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-04  3:23 [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: preserve insertion order for same-scope addresses Yumei Huang
2026-01-05 21:56 ` Justin Iurman
2026-01-06 17:37 ` David Ahern
2026-01-07  1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176774760977.2183630.3799089848817482368.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=justin.iurman@uliege.be \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuhuang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox