* [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support
@ 2026-01-12 2:45 javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP javen
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: javen @ 2026-01-12 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Javen Xu
From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
new chip RTL9151AS.
Javen Xu (3):
r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
r8169: enable LTR support
r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
@ 2026-01-12 2:45 ` javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] r8169: enable LTR support javen
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: javen @ 2026-01-12 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Javen Xu
From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
This adds DASH support for chip RTL8127AP. Its mac version is
RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80 and revision id is 0x04. DASH is a standard for
remote management of network device, allowing out-of-band control.
Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index 755083852eef..f9df6aadacce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -1513,6 +1513,10 @@ static enum rtl_dash_type rtl_get_dash_type(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
return RTL_DASH_EP;
case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_66:
return RTL_DASH_25_BP;
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80:
+ return (tp->pci_dev->revision == 0x04)
+ ? RTL_DASH_25_BP
+ : RTL_DASH_NONE;
default:
return RTL_DASH_NONE;
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] r8169: enable LTR support
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP javen
@ 2026-01-12 2:45 ` javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS javen
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: javen @ 2026-01-12 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Javen Xu
From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
This patch will enable
RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 LTR support.
Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index f9df6aadacce..9b89bbf67198 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -312,6 +312,15 @@ enum rtl_registers {
IBIMR0 = 0xfa,
IBISR0 = 0xfb,
FuncForceEvent = 0xfc,
+
+ ALDPS_LTR = 0xe0a2,
+ LTR_OBFF_LOCK = 0xe032,
+ LTR_SNOOP = 0xe034,
+
+#define ALDPS_LTR_EN BIT(0)
+#define LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN BIT(0)
+#define LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN BIT(14)
+#define LTR_SNOOP_EN GENMASK(15, 14)
};
enum rtl8168_8101_registers {
@@ -397,6 +406,8 @@ enum rtl8168_registers {
#define PWM_EN (1 << 22)
#define RXDV_GATED_EN (1 << 19)
#define EARLY_TALLY_EN (1 << 16)
+ COMBO_LTR_EXTEND = 0xb6,
+#define COMBO_LTR_EXTEND_EN BIT(0)
};
enum rtl8125_registers {
@@ -2919,6 +2930,92 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
}
}
+static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
+{
+ switch (tp->mac_version) {
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80:
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_SNOOP, 0x0000, LTR_SNOOP_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, ALDPS_LTR, 0x0000, ALDPS_LTR_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x8c09);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcde8, 0x887a);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdea, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdec, 0x8c09);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdee, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf0, 0x8a62);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf2, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf4, 0x883e);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf6, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf8, 0x8849);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdfa, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0000, LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN);
+ break;
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70:
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_SNOOP, 0x0000, LTR_SNOOP_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, ALDPS_LTR, 0x0000, ALDPS_LTR_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x8c09);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcde8, 0x887a);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdea, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdec, 0x8c09);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdee, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf0, 0x8a62);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf2, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf4, 0x883e);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf6, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0000, LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN);
+ break;
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_66:
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_SNOOP, 0x0000, LTR_SNOOP_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, ALDPS_LTR, 0x0000, ALDPS_LTR_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x889c);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x8c30);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcde8, 0x883e);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdea, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdec, 0x889c);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdee, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf0, 0x8C09);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf2, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0000, LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN);
+ break;
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_48:
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_52:
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, ALDPS_LTR, 0x0000, ALDPS_LTR_EN);
+ RTL_W8(tp, COMBO_LTR_EXTEND, RTL_R8(tp, COMBO_LTR_EXTEND) | COMBO_LTR_EXTEND_EN);
+ fallthrough;
+ case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_51:
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_SNOOP, 0x0000, LTR_SNOOP_EN);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xe02c, 0x1880);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xe02e, 0x4880);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x883c);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x8c12);
+ r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return;
+ }
+ /* chip can trigger LTR */
+ r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, LTR_OBFF_LOCK, 0x0003, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN);
+}
+
static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
{
u8 val8;
@@ -2947,6 +3044,7 @@ static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
break;
}
+ rtl_enable_ltr(tp);
switch (tp->mac_version) {
case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_48:
case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST:
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] r8169: enable LTR support javen
@ 2026-01-12 2:45 ` javen
2026-01-12 22:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-13 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-01-13 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
4 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: javen @ 2026-01-12 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Javen Xu
From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming chips.
rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS and
coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A is
different.
Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
- RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
+ RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
+ RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
};
struct rtl8169_private;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
#define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
static const struct rtl_chip_info {
- u16 mask;
- u16 val;
+ u32 mask;
+ u32 val;
enum mac_version mac_version;
const char *name;
const char *fw_name;
@@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
{ 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
{ 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
+ /* extend chip version*/
+ { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
+
/* Catch-all */
{ 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
};
+static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
+ { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS", FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
+
+ /* Catch-all */
+ { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
+};
+
static const struct pci_device_id rtl8169_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2502) },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2600) },
@@ -255,6 +265,8 @@ enum rtl_registers {
IntrStatus = 0x3e,
TxConfig = 0x40,
+ /* Extend version register */
+ TX_CONFIG_V2 = 0x60b0,
#define TXCFG_AUTO_FIFO (1 << 7) /* 8111e-vl */
#define TXCFG_EMPTY (1 << 11) /* 8111e-vl */
@@ -2351,6 +2363,15 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops rtl8169_ethtool_ops = {
.get_eth_ctrl_stats = rtl8169_get_eth_ctrl_stats,
};
+static const struct rtl_chip_info *rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(u32 txconfigv2)
+{
+ const struct rtl_chip_info *p = rtl_chip_infos_extend;
+
+ while ((txconfigv2 & p->mask) != p->val)
+ p++;
+ return p;
+}
+
static const struct rtl_chip_info *rtl8169_get_chip_version(u16 xid, bool gmii)
{
/* Chips combining a 1Gbps MAC with a 100Mbps PHY */
@@ -5543,6 +5564,9 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
/* Identify chip attached to board */
chip = rtl8169_get_chip_version(xid, tp->supports_gmii);
+
+ if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND)
+ chip = rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(RTL_R32(tp, TX_CONFIG_V2));
if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV,
"unknown chip XID %03x, contact r8169 maintainers (see MAINTAINERS file)\n",
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS javen
@ 2026-01-12 22:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-13 2:18 ` javen
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2026-01-12 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: javen, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>
> This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
> version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming chips.
> rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS and
> coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A is
>
> different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
> RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
> - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
> };
>
> struct rtl8169_private;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
> #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
>
> static const struct rtl_chip_info {
> - u16 mask;
> - u16 val;
> + u32 mask;
> + u32 val;
> enum mac_version mac_version;
> const char *name;
> const char *fw_name;
> @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
> { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
> { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
>
> + /* extend chip version*/
> + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
> +
> /* Catch-all */
> { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
> };
>
> +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
> + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS", FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
> +
Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However register is
named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx configuration.
Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
> + /* Catch-all */
> + { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
> +};
> +
> static const struct pci_device_id rtl8169_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2502) },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2600) },
> @@ -255,6 +265,8 @@ enum rtl_registers {
> IntrStatus = 0x3e,
>
> TxConfig = 0x40,
> + /* Extend version register */
> + TX_CONFIG_V2 = 0x60b0,
> #define TXCFG_AUTO_FIFO (1 << 7) /* 8111e-vl */
> #define TXCFG_EMPTY (1 << 11) /* 8111e-vl */
>
> @@ -2351,6 +2363,15 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops rtl8169_ethtool_ops = {
> .get_eth_ctrl_stats = rtl8169_get_eth_ctrl_stats,
> };
>
> +static const struct rtl_chip_info *rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(u32 txconfigv2)
> +{
> + const struct rtl_chip_info *p = rtl_chip_infos_extend;
> +
> + while ((txconfigv2 & p->mask) != p->val)
> + p++;
> + return p;
> +}
> +
> static const struct rtl_chip_info *rtl8169_get_chip_version(u16 xid, bool gmii)
> {
> /* Chips combining a 1Gbps MAC with a 100Mbps PHY */
> @@ -5543,6 +5564,9 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>
> /* Identify chip attached to board */
> chip = rtl8169_get_chip_version(xid, tp->supports_gmii);
> +
> + if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND)
> + chip = rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(RTL_R32(tp, TX_CONFIG_V2));
> if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE)
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV,
> "unknown chip XID %03x, contact r8169 maintainers (see MAINTAINERS file)\n",
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-12 22:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
@ 2026-01-13 2:18 ` javen
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: javen @ 2026-01-13 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hkallweit1
Cc: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, horms, javen_xu, kuba,
linux-kernel, netdev, nic_swsd, pabeni
> On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
> > From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
> >
> > This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
> > version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming
> chips.
> > rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS
> > and coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A is
> >
> > different.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28
> > +++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> > index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
> > @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
> > RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
> > RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
> > RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
> > - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
> > + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
> > + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
> > };
> >
> > struct rtl8169_private;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> > index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> > @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
> > #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
> >
> > static const struct rtl_chip_info {
> > - u16 mask;
> > - u16 val;
> > + u32 mask;
> > + u32 val;
> > enum mac_version mac_version;
> > const char *name;
> > const char *fw_name;
> > @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
> > { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
> > { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
> >
> > + /* extend chip version*/
> > + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
> > +
> > /* Catch-all */
> > { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE } };
> >
> > +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
> > + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS",
> > +FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
> > +
>
> Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However register is
> named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx
> configuration.
> Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
>
Previously, we used TxConfig for chip detection. But considering that the
remaining version IDs are limited, we need to extend it. To remain the
consistency of name, we choose TX_CONFIG_V2 to extend it. Bit 31 is
reserved and always 0. Only if nic link drop, it will be set to 1.
> > + /* Catch-all */
> > + { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE } };
> > +
> > static const struct pci_device_id rtl8169_pci_tbl[] = {
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2502) },
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(REALTEK, 0x2600) }, @@ -255,6 +265,8 @@ enum
> > rtl_registers {
> > IntrStatus = 0x3e,
> >
> > TxConfig = 0x40,
> > + /* Extend version register */
> > + TX_CONFIG_V2 = 0x60b0,
> > #define TXCFG_AUTO_FIFO (1 << 7) /* 8111e-vl */
> > #define TXCFG_EMPTY (1 << 11) /* 8111e-vl */
> >
> > @@ -2351,6 +2363,15 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops
> rtl8169_ethtool_ops = {
> > .get_eth_ctrl_stats = rtl8169_get_eth_ctrl_stats,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct rtl_chip_info
> > +*rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(u32 txconfigv2) {
> > + const struct rtl_chip_info *p = rtl_chip_infos_extend;
> > +
> > + while ((txconfigv2 & p->mask) != p->val)
> > + p++;
> > + return p;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct rtl_chip_info *rtl8169_get_chip_version(u16 xid,
> > bool gmii) {
> > /* Chips combining a 1Gbps MAC with a 100Mbps PHY */ @@ -5543,6
> > +5564,9 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
> > pci_device_id *ent)
> >
> > /* Identify chip attached to board */
> > chip = rtl8169_get_chip_version(xid, tp->supports_gmii);
> > +
> > + if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND)
> > + chip = rtl8169_get_extend_chip_version(RTL_R32(tp,
> > + TX_CONFIG_V2));
> > if (chip->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE)
> > return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV,
> > "unknown chip XID %03x, contact
> > r8169 maintainers (see MAINTAINERS file)\n",
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS javen
@ 2026-01-13 10:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-01-13 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
4 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-01-13 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: javen
Cc: hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
pabeni, horms, netdev, linux-kernel
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:45:38 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>
> This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
> RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
> new chip RTL9151AS.
>
> Javen Xu (3):
> r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
> r8169: enable LTR support
> r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v1,1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3259d2cf9427
- [net-next,v1,2/3] r8169: enable LTR support
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9ab94a32af70
- [net-next,v1,3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-01-13 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2026-01-13 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-13 17:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
4 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-01-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: javen, hkallweit1, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba,
horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
On 1/12/26 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>
> This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
> RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
> new chip RTL9151AS.
>
> Javen Xu (3):
> r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
> r8169: enable LTR support
> r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Note that you should not have posted this revision with the previous one
still pending:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260109070415.1115-3-javen_xu@realsil.com.cn/
I process the patch in order and I applied the above before reaching here.
@Heiner: I'm sorry for the confusion; the patchwork backlog size called
for somewhat urgent action and I thought your doubt for the patches
posted there where solved. Please LMK if a revert is required.
@Javen: please wait for Heiner feedback about an eventual revert before
any further action.
Thanks,
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support
2026-01-13 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-01-13 17:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2026-01-13 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, javen, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet,
kuba, horms
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
On 1/13/2026 11:01 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 1/12/26 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>
>> This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
>> RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
>> new chip RTL9151AS.
>>
>> Javen Xu (3):
>> r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
>> r8169: enable LTR support
>> r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 +-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Note that you should not have posted this revision with the previous one
> still pending:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260109070415.1115-3-javen_xu@realsil.com.cn/
>
> I process the patch in order and I applied the above before reaching here.
>
> @Heiner: I'm sorry for the confusion; the patchwork backlog size called
> for somewhat urgent action and I thought your doubt for the patches
> posted there where solved. Please LMK if a revert is required.
>
Patches are fine with me.
> @Javen: please wait for Heiner feedback about an eventual revert before
> any further action.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Heiner
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-12 22:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-13 2:18 ` javen
@ 2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-15 20:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-22 1:42 ` 许俊伟
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2026-01-15 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit, javen
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet,
kuba, horms
On 1/12/26 11:20 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>
>> This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
>> version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming chips.
>> rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS and
>> coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A is
>>
>> different.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>> index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
>> - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
>> };
>>
>> struct rtl8169_private;
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
>> #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
>>
>> static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>> - u16 mask;
>> - u16 val;
>> + u32 mask;
>> + u32 val;
>> enum mac_version mac_version;
>> const char *name;
>> const char *fw_name;
>> @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>> { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
>> { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
>>
>> + /* extend chip version*/
>> + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
>> +
>> /* Catch-all */
>> { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
>> + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS", FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
>> +
>
> Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However register is
> named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx configuration.
> Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
@Heiner (double checking to avoid more confusion on my side): are you
fine with the register name? It's unclear to me if you are fine with
just the 2 merged patches or even with this one.
Thanks,
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2026-01-15 20:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-22 1:42 ` 许俊伟
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2026-01-15 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, javen
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, nic_swsd, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet,
kuba, horms
On 1/15/2026 11:51 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 1/12/26 11:20 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
>>> version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming chips.
>>> rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS and
>>> coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A is
>>>
>>> different.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
>>> - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct rtl8169_private;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
>>> #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
>>>
>>> static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>> - u16 mask;
>>> - u16 val;
>>> + u32 mask;
>>> + u32 val;
>>> enum mac_version mac_version;
>>> const char *name;
>>> const char *fw_name;
>>> @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>> { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
>>> { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
>>>
>>> + /* extend chip version*/
>>> + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
>>> +
>>> /* Catch-all */
>>> { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE }
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
>>> + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS", FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
>>> +
>>
>> Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However register is
>> named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx configuration.
>> Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
>
> @Heiner (double checking to avoid more confusion on my side): are you
> fine with the register name? It's unclear to me if you are fine with
> just the 2 merged patches or even with this one.
>
I understand their motivation for the register name, even though I don't find it ideal.
But if their datasheet calls it like this, then ok.
So yes, patch is fine with me.
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-15 20:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
@ 2026-01-22 1:42 ` 许俊伟
2026-01-24 21:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: 许俊伟 @ 2026-01-22 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Abeni, Heiner Kallweit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nic_swsd@realtek.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
>On 1/12/26 11:20 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
>>> version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming
>chips.
>>> rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS
>>> and coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A
>>> is
>>>
>>> different.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
>>> - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct rtl8169_private;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
>>> #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
>>>
>>> static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>> - u16 mask;
>>> - u16 val;
>>> + u32 mask;
>>> + u32 val;
>>> enum mac_version mac_version;
>>> const char *name;
>>> const char *fw_name;
>>> @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>> { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
>>> { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
>>>
>>> + /* extend chip version*/
>>> + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
>>> +
>>> /* Catch-all */
>>> { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE } };
>>>
>>> +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
>>> + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS",
>>> +FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
>>> +
>>
>> Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However
>> register is named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx
>configuration.
>> Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
>
>@Heiner (double checking to avoid more confusion on my side): are you fine
>with the register name? It's unclear to me if you are fine with just the 2
>merged patches or even with this one.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Paolo
Hi, Paolo & Heiner
It appears that this patch has not been accepted yet. Should I resubmit it as a
separate patch?
Thank,
Javen Xu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
2026-01-22 1:42 ` 许俊伟
@ 2026-01-24 21:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2026-01-24 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 许俊伟, Paolo Abeni
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nic_swsd@realtek.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org
On 1/22/2026 2:42 AM, 许俊伟 wrote:
>> On 1/12/26 11:20 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2026 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
>>>> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds support for chip RTL9151AS. Since lacking of Hardware
>>>> version IDs, we use TX_CONFIG_V2 to recognize RTL9151AS and coming
>> chips.
>>>> rtl_chip_infos_extend is used to store IC information for RTL9151AS
>>>> and coming chips. The TxConfig value between RTL9151AS and RTL9151A
>>>> is
>>>>
>>>> different.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h | 3 ++-
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 28
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>>> index 2c1a0c21af8d..f66c279cbee6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h
>>>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ enum mac_version {
>>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70,
>>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80,
>>>> RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE,
>>>> - RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1
>>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_LAST = RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE - 1,
>>>> + RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct rtl8169_private;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> index 9b89bbf67198..164ad6570059 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>>> @@ -95,8 +95,8 @@
>>>> #define JUMBO_16K (SZ_16K - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN)
>>>>
>>>> static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>>> - u16 mask;
>>>> - u16 val;
>>>> + u32 mask;
>>>> + u32 val;
>>>> enum mac_version mac_version;
>>>> const char *name;
>>>> const char *fw_name;
>>>> @@ -205,10 +205,20 @@ static const struct rtl_chip_info {
>>>> { 0xfc8, 0x040, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_03, "RTL8110s" },
>>>> { 0xfc8, 0x008, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_02, "RTL8169s" },
>>>>
>>>> + /* extend chip version*/
>>>> + { 0x7cf, 0x7c8, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_CHECK_EXTEND },
>>>> +
>>>> /* Catch-all */
>>>> { 0x000, 0x000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_NONE } };
>>>>
>>>> +static const struct rtl_chip_info rtl_chip_infos_extend[] = {
>>>> + { 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_64, "RTL9151AS",
>>>> +FIRMWARE_9151A_1},
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Seems all bits except bit 31 are used for chip detection. However
>>> register is named TX_CONFIG_V2, even though only bit 31 is left for actual tx
>> configuration.
>>> Is the register name misleading, or is the mask incorrect?
>>
>> @Heiner (double checking to avoid more confusion on my side): are you fine
>> with the register name? It's unclear to me if you are fine with just the 2
>> merged patches or even with this one.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paolo
>
> Hi, Paolo & Heiner
>
> It appears that this patch has not been accepted yet. Should I resubmit it as a
> separate patch?
>
I will slightly extend your patch to display the new extended XID properly
in places where the XID is printed, and submit it on your behalf.
> Thank,
> Javen Xu
Heiner
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-24 21:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-12 2:45 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] r8169: enable LTR support javen
2026-01-12 2:45 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS javen
2026-01-12 22:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-13 2:18 ` javen
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-15 20:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-22 1:42 ` 许俊伟
2026-01-24 21:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-01-13 10:00 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-01-13 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-01-13 17:15 ` Heiner Kallweit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox