netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan)
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, hpa@zytor.com, stephen@dino.dnsalias.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ProxyARP and IPSec
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:22:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17684.46751.466893.446331@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060922.133646.68153303.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller writes:
 > Essentially, if you use ports as part of your selector,
 > then it is impossible to handle anything other than the
 > first fragment of a fragmented frame because the subsequent
 > fragments will not have the ports which you need in order
 > to match.

If you have port/protocol based selectors and you are firewalling then
re-assembly is already being done so IPsec will see the re-assembled
packet at little cost.  Alternately in a pure IPsec configuration it
possible to arrange things so that re-assembly is only done if
port/protocol based selectors are used.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-23  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-23  0:31 ProxyARP and IPSec H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-23 19:14 ` Thomas Graf
2006-08-23 22:14   ` David Miller
2006-08-23 23:18     ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-08-24  1:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-24  1:14         ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-24  2:20           ` Andy Gay
2006-08-24  4:14             ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-24 12:50               ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-08-26  4:16                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-09-02 15:36                   ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-09-02 17:30                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-09-02 20:54                       ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-09-05  5:17                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-09-04 22:27                       ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-05  5:12                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-09-05  9:05                           ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-22 20:36                             ` David Miller
2006-09-23  4:22                               ` Stephen J. Bevan [this message]
2006-09-06  2:25                         ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-08-24 10:50     ` Thomas Graf
2006-09-07 22:28       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-09-08  7:37         ` Thomas Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17684.46751.466893.446331@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=stephen@dino.dnsalias.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).