From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614AB38A728; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768832582; cv=none; b=Or5yPl0vOtCss6TkdsTfTdx+5ybnP34Q2PQeHycGKMblkE4264FSUq9+WiYc733SEnxGGDktc7JTCfD/2OC4gW2vVGKM/lGrUOzBHsuf8H5tP804s98WoPyTsAfZS84cq8iHTRDiUIOFOvJ54i09ytUiBOuVIEENNO/tCaynYpg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768832582; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3rseO2VdOcdRR2kY2+qI+fLi8ZuR3zafi9NP2SKUHYU=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=E2rGEjG5iLtObexKaSNJuodsNohv5fsBE54DSn8OT2pTXJPwGF09kVpVgnwEkGVfnRrHrZfTvvGzimHROU4KPnsGHx0k7IIfkUgowAIt+HI/L5Cmo44lcsxqHwB4mX6Erd8skrGOJ4iVaJevtvEpJcedm5eTAis+w2zb0C0H93Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OpF5eZ0X; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OpF5eZ0X" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE223C19424; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:23:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768832582; bh=3rseO2VdOcdRR2kY2+qI+fLi8ZuR3zafi9NP2SKUHYU=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=OpF5eZ0XqUx1N1nQZtIDYb3qTLD+bifKq2xeEtoSjuq8avJ5cMn6xDb036Nzoegyq 6178kR67yRzcRaL5jIIAIFUVHGlCUP1SAt50r6QXqoVRC7Ldhd2pIbvOejFpqnxZCU kKg1oSX2t6vI6G1A+roD7fuVmMsE9MDsa9adnaVI6uWhv6Ud2nB3Ktip9x0b7cocRt dFLvZJjSzNSXNjg3jkqd7CtSS1hPng/QfEEYr3FmSTk3bddEsAerb/R0yBw5UQ5CFc qsiFHir7WCVOZYGwkW9QjRK7zJzkXiDwNalqs+65bsx9Z1qoFC+f7HW+ok5yy70T1o TlUVZ9SEGnd3Q== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A923A55FAF; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] selftests: net: improve error handling in passive TFO test From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <176883237152.1426077.2316516849712377834.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:19:31 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: To: Yohei Kojima Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, Markus.Elfring@web.de Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 23:11:53 +0900 you wrote: > This series improves error handling in the passive TFO test by (1) > fixing a broken behavior when the child processes failed (or timed out), > and (2) adding more error handlng code in the test program. > > The first patch fixes the behavior that the test didn't report failure > even if the server or the client process exited with non-zero status. > The second patch adds error handling code in the test program to improve > reliability of the test. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v2,1/2] selftests: net: fix passive TFO test to fail if child processes failed https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/52b485973043 - [net-next,v2,2/2] selftests: net: improve error handling in passive TFO test https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/342e31254f02 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html