From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
willemb@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] selftests: drv-net: rss: validate min RSS table size
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 01:10:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177008101712.1258089.1843088845527602329.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260131225454.1225151-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 14:54:53 -0800 you wrote:
> Add a test which checks that the RSS table is at least 4x the max
> queue count supported by the device. The original RSS spec from
> Microsoft stated that the RSS indirection table should be 2 to 8
> times the CPU count, presumably assuming queue per CPU. If the
> CPU count is not a power of two, however, a power-of-2 table
> 2x larger than queue count results in a 33% traffic imbalance.
> Validate that the indirection table is at least 4x the queue
> count. This lowers the imbalance to 16% which empirically
> appears to be more acceptable to memcache-like workloads.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,1/2] selftests: drv-net: rss: validate min RSS table size
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9e3d4dae9832
- [net-next,v2,2/2] docs: networking: mention that RSS table should be 4x the queue count
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ba9c5611f088
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 22:54 [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] selftests: drv-net: rss: validate min RSS table size Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-31 22:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] docs: networking: mention that RSS table should be 4x the queue count Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-01 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-02-03 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2026-02-11 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] selftests: drv-net: rss: validate min RSS table size Yael Chemla
2026-02-11 21:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-12 9:41 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-02-13 1:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-16 8:28 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-02-17 21:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-18 8:02 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-02-18 15:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177008101712.1258089.1843088845527602329.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox