* [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
@ 2026-02-04 10:37 Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-05 17:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Russell King (Oracle) @ 2026-02-04 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: Alexandre Torgue, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, imx,
Jakub Kicinski, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, netdev,
Paolo Abeni, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Sascha Hauer, Shawn Guo
When looking at the iMX93 documentation, the definitions in the driver
do not correspond with the documentation, which makes the driver
confusing.
The driver, for example, re-uses a definition for bit 0 for two
different registers, where this bit have completely different purposes.
Fix this by renaming the second register, and adding a definition that
reflects the true purpose of bit 0 in the first register (EQOS enable.)
Replace MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK with MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE
and MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK as MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK
is not a register field.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 25 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
index ecc0c3483423..c4e85197629d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
#define GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_CLK_SEL (0x1 << 20)
#define GPR_ENET_QOS_RGMII_EN (0x1 << 21)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK GENMASK(3, 1)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN (0x1 << 0)
-#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_SEL_MASK BIT_MASK(0)
-#define MX93_GPR_CLK_SEL_OFFSET (4)
+#define MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE BIT(0)
+
+#define MX93_ENET_CLK_SEL_OFFSET (4)
+#define MX93_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_SEL_MASK BIT_MASK(0)
#define DMA_BUS_MODE 0x00001000
#define DMA_BUS_MODE_SFT_RESET (0x1 << 0)
@@ -95,17 +95,18 @@ static int imx93_set_intf_mode(struct imx_priv_data *dwmac, u8 phy_intf_sel)
if (phy_intf_sel == PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII && dwmac->rmii_refclk_ext) {
ret = regmap_clear_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap,
dwmac->intf_reg_off +
- MX93_GPR_CLK_SEL_OFFSET,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_SEL_MASK);
+ MX93_ENET_CLK_SEL_OFFSET,
+ MX93_ENET_QOS_CLK_TX_SEL_MASK);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
val = FIELD_PREP(MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK, phy_intf_sel) |
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN;
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE;
return regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, val);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, val);
};
static int imx_dwmac_clks_config(void *priv, bool enabled)
@@ -205,7 +206,8 @@ static void imx93_dwmac_fix_speed(void *priv, int speed, unsigned int mode)
old_ctrl = readl(dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
ctrl = old_ctrl & ~CTRL_SPEED_MASK;
regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, 0);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, 0);
writel(ctrl, dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
/* Ensure the settings for CTRL are applied. */
@@ -213,9 +215,10 @@ static void imx93_dwmac_fix_speed(void *priv, int speed, unsigned int mode)
usleep_range(10, 20);
iface &= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK;
- iface |= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_CLK_GEN_EN;
+ iface |= MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE;
regmap_update_bits(dwmac->intf_regmap, dwmac->intf_reg_off,
- MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_MODE_MASK, iface);
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MASK |
+ MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_ENABLE, iface);
writel(old_ctrl, dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
}
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
2026-02-04 10:37 [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions Russell King (Oracle)
@ 2026-02-05 17:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-02-05 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King
Cc: andrew, alexandre.torgue, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, imx,
kuba, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, netdev, pabeni, kernel,
s.hauer, shawnguo
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2026 10:37:59 +0000 you wrote:
> When looking at the iMX93 documentation, the definitions in the driver
> do not correspond with the documentation, which makes the driver
> confusing.
>
> The driver, for example, re-uses a definition for bit 0 for two
> different registers, where this bit have completely different purposes.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7e7fcfb0798a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-05 17:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-04 10:37 [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: imx: fix iMX93 register definitions Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-05 17:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox