From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
Cc: <pabeni@redhat.com>, <mst@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>,
<xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>, <eperezma@redhat.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<ndabilpuram@marvell.com>, <kshankar@marvell.com>,
<schalla@marvell.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,2/2] virtio_net: replace RSS key size max check with BUILD_BUG_ON
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 17:11:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1772010702.3747633-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224065850.962826-2-schalla@marvell.com>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:28:50 +0530, Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com> wrote:
> Since NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN was increased to 256 in net-next, use
> BUILD_BUG_ON to enforce the limit at compile time and remove the
> redundant runtime max check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index eeefe8abc122..768ad5523dfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -6639,13 +6639,7 @@ static int virtnet_validate(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS);
> __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT);
> }
> - if (key_sz > NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN) {
> - dev_warn(&vdev->dev,
> - "rss_max_key_size=%u exceeds driver limit %u, disabling RSS\n",
> - key_sz, NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN);
> - __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS);
> - __virtio_clear_bit(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT);
> - }
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(type_max(key_sz) >= NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN);
Do we really need this check?
If I understand correctly, the intention is to cap key_sz at 256. However, since
key_sz is of type u8, its maximum value is inherently 255, making this check
redundant. This is not only limited by this kernel code, the virtio-net spec
defines this.
Moreover, if NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN is ever reduced to a value smaller than 256 in
the future, this check would no longer enforce the intended limit correctly.
Moreover, you should add a cover letter.
Thanks.
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-25 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 6:58 [PATCH net,v4,1/2] virtio_net: Improve RSS key size validation and use NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Srujana Challa
2026-02-24 6:58 ` [PATCH net-next,2/2] virtio_net: replace RSS key size max check with BUILD_BUG_ON Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 9:11 ` Xuan Zhuo [this message]
2026-02-25 9:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 9:30 ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25 9:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 9:36 ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25 9:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 9:52 ` Xuan Zhuo
2026-02-25 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:13 ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:29 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 14:50 ` David Laight
2026-02-25 14:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 10:03 ` [PATCH net,v4,1/2] virtio_net: Improve RSS key size validation and use NETDEV_RSS_KEY_LEN Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:22 ` [EXTERNAL] " Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:34 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:47 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 12:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 12:56 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 13:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-25 13:31 ` Srujana Challa
2026-02-25 13:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-02-26 12:38 ` Srujana Challa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-24 4:52 Srujana Challa
2026-02-24 4:52 ` [PATCH net-next,2/2] virtio_net: replace RSS key size max check with BUILD_BUG_ON Srujana Challa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1772010702.3747633-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kshankar@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=schalla@marvell.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox