From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458252BE7A7; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772157604; cv=none; b=tsWEdjwILGitE9/3xusF+G+pYMGkVpt6wQKHOev8cljXgEkK/tkIYXHJ69q6T4741YARQSyHG5UnVZEapl1qCsdoxBs406O6yqtZ1WQMuGZw6qU7vS4TKhA1f7+WgdyfN4oInz0QvcjWrpdU8lIN+Ho8kgSGNIVqkKj2zJcUpbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772157604; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WxRly+usZrgw7xbIxqEsBiHQt2eGiy4PINnOr3cASIs=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=e9ibebP2EAS4Nw+cf3NsklrGcyFQYRj/RRPNFc8XLfpr8NCp8seia8lM2oOf5FBzUSQZDGMk/yvv+BEe4GUgiO7cQ0V2hjIQ1wr6SPRcy0DUZC3R6MGjXOMSfj7gnIjtdzABTT/EYhbmSzbeZmvC2wSUy8qKUn2VXve5XAcRoWo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Y3Ezg4v4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Y3Ezg4v4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F66EC2BC86; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:00:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772157604; bh=WxRly+usZrgw7xbIxqEsBiHQt2eGiy4PINnOr3cASIs=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=Y3Ezg4v43CGpy1TmLpzTUv0kmHHaCi0gL7y8LcqGmJN/yM3G0AM7WFyxZaPEJaMoP HFXWfGBWDlKl0iTE3pdVr5eP2L596mu/4SB20n5U/t2oLgea8BpVgcqBToM2LbcYg9 f9mDtwHeQanWYjdf1syGZCJSi2EZnS9zSfbyJE4z4fZLe7f/gZhc7Ej5MaWZ2NWl6N 9uMMgO5b/hnuO8Vz31v2U65jlXnL9noHKTURgngb+lt60CjeIYFDHxcBzxJ80zgv9N +nWOzos3bw2aSgiOpd160xritW3dN+z+xmvxJ7UKWoSgwHcRM/Ek3vpBhl7weyEMJI C7pcBrTYkgbzw== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D01C393109E; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] docs: ethtool: clarify the bit-by-bit bitset format description From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <177215760804.1939634.7190902746570621905.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 02:00:08 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: To: Yohei Kojima Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 00:12:09 +0900 you wrote: > Clarify the bit-by-bit bitset format's behavior around mandatory > attributes and bit identification. More specifically, the following > changes are made: > > * Rephrase a misleading sentence which implies name and index are > mutually exclusive > * Describe that ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS nest is mandatory > * Describe that a request fails if inconsistent identifiers are given > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v3] docs: ethtool: clarify the bit-by-bit bitset format description https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5cf47393d96f You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html