From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CDA1DF980 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 03:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772248808; cv=none; b=XNtugcZRRpq7e+2aqVEHAxl8fRWf8/JP2Jzf3ptLCo0weSeZ8GDi2fuHOgGnHzP6KjPIYCEEcFeAVNyVrdXEhh/xdn3+5uVF8iqpH+oT4V3W8K/NNrt28bpmnEyUQgePbXBCdkRNTAkGVjWqPlCibls54uV6RInra6cO+FMZfA4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772248808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0K3ggO4fpBOT+5Gyk2nsEoxMv9aDTJ9vJMAYCgul7Kc=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Kfdl563JhXOTvgJONkl6X8ziKzJZAzSZwp4EwSvvuCvhUwxDndHjhxZqXCdsq66FTPO+dmGgqzuQZuwdc82VU7P39naVnuefRXmaHvl5lwlgOhniVfo/8/R86QE0d2xPU/AzBqg8+hcrJShVLlB/jkmmKZGVNkg3IyTsczCStOY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gqbR1EIN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gqbR1EIN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C15A4C116D0; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 03:20:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772248807; bh=0K3ggO4fpBOT+5Gyk2nsEoxMv9aDTJ9vJMAYCgul7Kc=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=gqbR1EINC8A40HR7kzCy/hdtILy3uQcOd8OTtZfod7ik4UxAaG3twNcz5/rskPnQi FWhJW8qR03+qhNCUYvhSKTua7LjbmkWuBamO24w69a2TW2erYlVVnMwZfD3NlTvzUV l2YKkqTTJfWlL+J6D8duK9x2t5P/yh96YGBAn6OVQBOh4q5mWMh4MJP0t9+/XnM8ff vhi2mpffthhXVvg1g513iwDDLsbnpBg+Ie2ki5VWKLXmrd45dzlJpHXCzb+fKh+fpq dixrb/ZnOESjcPRkl8tAz+SgiliXC+74b219SG4M1v8/DJOfzgx3SYDmTAsuiXNLIt QWNRLj0lBR0Vg== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFFC39EF96C; Sat, 28 Feb 2026 03:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv6: discard fragment queue earlier if there is malformed datagram From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <177224881128.2851960.13487790635140793923.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 03:20:11 +0000 References: <20260225133758.4553-1-fmancera@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20260225133758.4553-1-fmancera@suse.de> To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 14:37:58 +0100 you wrote: > Currently the kernel IPv6 implementation is not dicarding the fragment > queue upon receiving a IPv6 fragment that is not 8 bytes aligned. It > relies on queue expiration to free the queue. > > While RFC 8200 section 4.5 does not explicitly mention that the rest of > fragments must be discarded, it does not make sense to keep them. The > parameter problem message is sent regardless that. In addition, if the > sender is able to re-compose the datagram so it is 8 bytes aligned it > would qualify as a new whole datagram not fitting into the same fragment > queue. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v2] ipv6: discard fragment queue earlier if there is malformed datagram https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9ff2d2a98370 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html