public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups
@ 2026-03-04 22:08 Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-04 22:08 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end() Vladimir Oltean
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2026-03-04 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni, Russell King

While I was playing around with the subsystem knowledge in Chris Mason's
review-prompts to see what LLMs would have needed to catch the bug
behind commit bfd264fbbbca ("net: dsa: sja1105: protect link replay
helpers against NULL phylink instance"), it flagged another issue
instead, which IMO is valid. This is being fixed in patch 2/2.
Patch 1/2 is preparatory reordering for that.

I haven't noticed any physical issues, it only has to do with the
soundness of the new call path introduced in January in commit
0b2edc531e0b ("net: dsa: sja1105: let phylink help with the replay of
link callbacks").

Vladimir Oltean (2):
  net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and
    phylink_replay_link_end()
  net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed

 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end()
  2026-03-04 22:08 [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups Vladimir Oltean
@ 2026-03-04 22:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-04 22:09 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-07  2:00 ` [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2026-03-04 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni, Russell King

Move phylink_replay_link_end() as the last locked operation under
sja1105_static_config_reload(). The purpose is to be able to goto
this step from the error path of intermediate steps (we must call
phylink_replay_link_end()).

sja1105_reload_cbs() notably does not depend on port states or link
speeds. See commit 954ad9bf13c4 ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix bandwidth
discrepancy between tc-cbs software and offload") which has discussed
this issue specifically.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
index 94d17b06da40..bf720d96bad8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
@@ -2339,13 +2339,11 @@ int sja1105_static_config_reload(struct sja1105_private *priv,
 			goto out;
 	}
 
+	rc = sja1105_reload_cbs(priv);
+
 	dsa_switch_for_each_available_port(dp, ds)
 		if (dp->pl)
 			phylink_replay_link_end(dp->pl);
-
-	rc = sja1105_reload_cbs(priv);
-	if (rc < 0)
-		goto out;
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->mgmt_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->fdb_lock);
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed
  2026-03-04 22:08 [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-04 22:08 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end() Vladimir Oltean
@ 2026-03-04 22:09 ` Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-07  2:00 ` [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2026-03-04 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni, Russell King

Most errors that can occur in sja1105_static_config_reload() are fatal
(example: fail to communicate with hardware), but not all are.

For example, sja1105_static_config_upload() -> kcalloc() may fail, and
if that happens, we have called phylink_replay_link_begin() but never
phylink_replay_link_end().

Under that circumstance, all port phylink instances are left in a state
where the resolver is stopped with the PHYLINK_DISABLE_REPLAY bit set.
We have effectively disabled link management with no way to recover from
this condition.

Avoid that situation by ensuring phylink_replay_link_begin() is always
paired with phylink_replay_link_end(), regardless of whether we faced
any errors during switch reset, configuration reload and general state
reload.

Fixes: 0b2edc531e0b ("net: dsa: sja1105: let phylink help with the replay of link callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
index bf720d96bad8..c72c2bfdcffb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
@@ -2341,10 +2341,11 @@ int sja1105_static_config_reload(struct sja1105_private *priv,
 
 	rc = sja1105_reload_cbs(priv);
 
+out:
 	dsa_switch_for_each_available_port(dp, ds)
 		if (dp->pl)
 			phylink_replay_link_end(dp->pl);
-out:
+
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->mgmt_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->fdb_lock);
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups
  2026-03-04 22:08 [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-04 22:08 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end() Vladimir Oltean
  2026-03-04 22:09 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed Vladimir Oltean
@ 2026-03-07  2:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-07  2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vladimir Oltean; +Cc: netdev, andrew, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, linux

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Thu,  5 Mar 2026 00:08:58 +0200 you wrote:
> While I was playing around with the subsystem knowledge in Chris Mason's
> review-prompts to see what LLMs would have needed to catch the bug
> behind commit bfd264fbbbca ("net: dsa: sja1105: protect link replay
> helpers against NULL phylink instance"), it flagged another issue
> instead, which IMO is valid. This is being fixed in patch 2/2.
> Patch 1/2 is preparatory reordering for that.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/976703cae737
  - [net,2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ce2da643f00a

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-07  2:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-04 22:08 [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups Vladimir Oltean
2026-03-04 22:08 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: sja1105: reorder sja1105_reload_cbs() and phylink_replay_link_end() Vladimir Oltean
2026-03-04 22:09 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: ensure phylink_replay_link_end() will not be missed Vladimir Oltean
2026-03-07  2:00 ` [PATCH net 0/2] Further SJA1105 phylink link replay fixups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox