From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B2B1EF39E for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773281419; cv=none; b=fITKtVbV3PQAFFX1Cl5WS0H5SEDl0Xi8FY/kq9nxLfGWrBhQyrDPouk6RUf9WnfkTW6MnoO6XIV/BebT86uXYWVSiSJbzkFY8BP+pyyZkJ50JbcrEEAIlRmDgzIEOXcIpCUJ6nhZWn+vzaPUSFU5+iBhNB3J6XQmHYB+k1YK1Gk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773281419; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FITkiM7d3wyfqN6I9YYP0N1Cnqv7GJ/qn4IkvWF/41U=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=VvEDlwjDBjAsopMgWR7gEMMreN5pB6G9YtOyi3flcaq2y3zV1so0CfFrV6qsGVjdq4255/PtKHYGq0OePo4QwUXWsKd7NeyLUaBn9QsBU15jcpoFgCtmqpJ7Zwfai39F0f43tadgHbnI8Zc1XNoNsLf/NY7fT6HpX/gnTOEJVMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u30bnS7F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u30bnS7F" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF766C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:10:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773281418; bh=FITkiM7d3wyfqN6I9YYP0N1Cnqv7GJ/qn4IkvWF/41U=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=u30bnS7FNv412daorRTuARfhsct0Dz0hWo+qAM2kQIchUmDgNd/gJ/VKG9P3LkOqV VkkhS6OWEOVW9f31IJroUJof1d1SFAs3JaHDlmq+apleTf41sSjGrc1P7lmizBZHpG gLMeQ56YWSqKf7uFq9DkCU2l7kcKR9pRrxGNyBi7EvzQIZjyd+zlXjESoSKcrHTHRb Ogh2ElngQlbLc/nOsgXN+nnxddsge4mpLHsq97hPrwZr2l62HHSECBhrIFluubtUed +IoY+2pJhAFJ2oqV1LcnbiYyBiVKycweR5K8/6G+Wxw1NJ0f9JV3hoQPYH6sKmnsEq bbGe7yBZdws0Q== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E853808200; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] neighbour: fix update of proxy neighbour From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <177328141454.3905617.15461656435350206907.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:10:14 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: To: Sabrina Dubroca Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:59:15 +0100 you wrote: > While re-reading some "old" patches I ran into a small change of > behavior in commit dc2a27e524ac ("neighbour: Update pneigh_entry in > pneigh_create()."). > > The old behavior was not consistent between ->protocol and ->flags, > and didn't offer a way to clear protocol, so maybe it's better to > change that (7-years-old [1]) behavior. But then we should change > non-proxy neighbours as well to keep neigh/pneigh consistent. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,1/2] neighbour: restore protocol != 0 check in pneigh update https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cbada1048847 - [net,2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: add neighbour update test https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/68e76fc12df0 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html