* [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect
@ 2026-03-11 7:06 Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-11 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-13 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiayuan Chen @ 2026-03-11 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Jiayuan Chen, syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271, Eric Dumazet,
Jiayuan Chen, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, Kees Cook, Takamitsu Iwai, Thomas Gleixner,
Pwnverse, Ingo Molnar, linux-hams, linux-kernel
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].
ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.
When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
is left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL.
When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() ->
rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69694d6f.050a0220.58bed.0027.GAE@google.com/T/
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 841d62481048..ba56213e0a2a 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -811,6 +811,11 @@ static int rose_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int
goto out_release;
}
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT) {
+ err = -EALREADY;
+ goto out_release;
+ }
+
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect
2026-03-11 7:06 [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect Jiayuan Chen
@ 2026-03-11 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-13 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-03-11 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiayuan Chen
Cc: netdev, Jiayuan Chen, syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271,
David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman,
Kees Cook, Takamitsu Iwai, Thomas Gleixner, Pwnverse, Ingo Molnar,
linux-hams, linux-kernel
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 8:06 AM Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
>
> syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].
>
> ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
> TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
> calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
> (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.
>
> When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection
> attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites
> rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket
> is left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL.
> When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees
> ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() ->
> rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in
> progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for
> TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().
>
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271
> [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69694d6f.050a0220.58bed.0027.GAE@google.com/T/
> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect
2026-03-11 7:06 [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-11 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2026-03-13 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-13 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiayuan Chen
Cc: netdev, jiayuan.chen, syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271, edumazet,
davem, kuba, pabeni, horms, kees, takamitz, tglx, stanksal, mingo,
linux-hams, linux-kernel
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:06:02 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
>
> syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].
>
> ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,
> TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects
> calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING
> (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/e1f0a18c9564
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-13 2:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-11 7:06 [PATCH net v2] net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect Jiayuan Chen
2026-03-11 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-13 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox