public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, sd@queasysnail.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, hare@suse.de, alistair.francis@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/6] TLS read_sock performance scalability
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:10:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <177451620504.2447831.2574474654524015767.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324-tls-read-sock-v5-0-5408befe5774@oracle.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:53:22 -0400 you wrote:
> I'd like to encourage in-kernel kTLS consumers (i.e., NFS and
> NVMe/TCP) to coalesce on the use of read_sock. When I suggested
> this to Hannes, he reported a number of nagging performance
> scalability issues with read_sock. This series is an attempt to
> run these issues down and get them fixed before we convert the
> above sock_recvmsg consumers over to read_sock.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v5,1/6] tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/84a8335d8300
  - [net-next,v5,2/6] tls: Abort the connection on decrypt failure
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,v5,3/6] tls: Fix dangling skb pointer in tls_sw_read_sock()
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,v5,4/6] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_release() from tls_strp_msg_done()
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,v5,5/6] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths
    (no matching commit)
  - [net-next,v5,6/6] tls: Flush backlog before waiting for a new record
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-26  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24 12:53 [PATCH net-next v5 0/6] TLS read_sock performance scalability Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/6] tls: Purge async_hold in tls_decrypt_async_wait() Chuck Lever
2026-03-26 10:32   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/6] tls: Abort the connection on decrypt failure Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/6] tls: Fix dangling skb pointer in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/6] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_release() from tls_strp_msg_done() Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/6] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 12:53 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/6] tls: Flush backlog before waiting for a new record Chuck Lever
2026-03-24 16:18   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-24 19:07     ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-26  8:59       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-26  9:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=177451620504.2447831.2574474654524015767.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox