* [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: use __jhash_final() in inet6_ehashfn()
@ 2026-03-27 4:06 Eric Dumazet
2026-03-29 18:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-03-27 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, Neal Cardwell, Kuniyuki Iwashima, netdev,
eric.dumazet, Eric Dumazet
I misread jhash2() implementation.
Last round should use __jhash_final() instead of __jhash_mix().
Using __jhash_mix() here leaves entropy distributed across a, b, and c,
which might lead to incomplete diffusion of the faddr and fport bits
into the bucket index. Replacing this last __jhash_mix() with
__jhash_final() provides the correct avalanche properties
for the returned value in c.
$ scripts/bloat-o-meter -t vmlinux.0 vmlinux
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-4 (-4)
Function old new delta
inet6_ehashfn 306 302 -4
Total: Before=25155089, After=25155085, chg -0.00%
Fixes: 854587e69ef3 ("tcp: improve inet6_ehashfn() entropy")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
v2: also update the comment (Jakub)
net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
index 109fbf620ad7cde54300b937db58ada0d5c80664..b111b51d69fc9b77ac6ea2576c1b553c74bb139d 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_hashtables.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ u32 inet6_ehashfn(const struct net *net,
* Hash laddr + faddr + lport/fport + net_hash_mix.
* Notes:
* We combine laddr[0] (high order 32 bits of local address)
- * with net_hash_mix() to avoid using __jhash_final(a, b, c).
+ * with net_hash_mix() to hash a multiple of 3 words.
*
* We do not include JHASH_INITVAL + 36 contribution
* to initial values of a, b, c.
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ u32 inet6_ehashfn(const struct net *net,
a += (__force u32)faddr->s6_addr32[2];
b += (__force u32)faddr->s6_addr32[3];
c += (__force u32)fport;
- __jhash_mix(a, b, c);
+ __jhash_final(a, b, c);
/* Note: We need to add @lport instead of fully hashing it.
* See commits 9544d60a2605 ("inet: change lport contribution
--
2.53.0.1018.g2bb0e51243-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: use __jhash_final() in inet6_ehashfn()
2026-03-27 4:06 [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: use __jhash_final() in inet6_ehashfn() Eric Dumazet
@ 2026-03-29 18:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-29 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, horms, ncardwell, kuniyu, netdev,
eric.dumazet
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 04:06:46 +0000 you wrote:
> I misread jhash2() implementation.
>
> Last round should use __jhash_final() instead of __jhash_mix().
>
> Using __jhash_mix() here leaves entropy distributed across a, b, and c,
> which might lead to incomplete diffusion of the faddr and fport bits
> into the bucket index. Replacing this last __jhash_mix() with
> __jhash_final() provides the correct avalanche properties
> for the returned value in c.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,net-next] tcp: use __jhash_final() in inet6_ehashfn()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/02d0e59e36e0
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-29 18:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-27 4:06 [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: use __jhash_final() in inet6_ehashfn() Eric Dumazet
2026-03-29 18:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox