From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
nb@tipi-net.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 23:10:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177525784228.1484550.17207546456531120252.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402-macb-irq-v2-0-942d98ab1154@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2026 21:41:21 +0800 you wrote:
> During debugging of a suspend/resume issue, I observed that the macb driver
> employs a dedicated IRQ handler for Wake-on-LAN (WoL) support. To my knowledge,
> no other Ethernet driver adopts this approach. This implementation unnecessarily
> complicates the suspend/resume process without providing any clear benefit.
> Instead, we can easily modify the existing IRQ handler to manage WoL events,
> avoiding any overhead in the TX/RX hot path.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,1/4] net: macb: Replace open-coded implementation with napi_schedule()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/dc3bd465ea36
- [net-next,v2,2/4] net: macb: Introduce macb_queue_isr_clear() helper function
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5986ff6e4136
- [net-next,v2,3/4] net: macb: Factor out the handling of non-hot IRQ events into a separate function
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6d55ce805b26
- [net-next,v2,4/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6637c03f35fa
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 13:41 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL Kevin Hao
2026-04-02 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: macb: Replace open-coded implementation with napi_schedule() Kevin Hao
2026-04-02 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: macb: Introduce macb_queue_isr_clear() helper function Kevin Hao
2026-04-02 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: macb: Factor out the handling of non-hot IRQ events into a separate function Kevin Hao
2026-04-02 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: macb: Remove dedicated IRQ handler for WoL Kevin Hao
2026-04-03 23:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177525784228.1484550.17207546456531120252.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox