From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29_=3Cu=2Ekleine-koenig?=@aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org,
=?utf-8?q?=40baylibre=2Ecom=3E?=@aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org
Cc: ivecera@redhat.com, Prathosh.Satish@microchip.com,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dpll: zl3073x: Use named initializers for struct i2c_device_id
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 02:10:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177932943911.3832404.650041739281306010.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519142710.1587324-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 19 May 2026 16:27:10 +0200 you wrote:
> While being less compact, using named initializers allows to more easily
> see which members of the structs are assigned which value without having
> to lookup the declaration of the struct. And it's also more robust
> against changes to the struct definition.
>
> This patch doesn't modify the compiled arrays, only their representation
> in source form benefits. The former was confirmed with x86 and arm64
> builds.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v1] dpll: zl3073x: Use named initializers for struct i2c_device_id
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a09dfac0296d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 14:27 [PATCH v1] dpll: zl3073x: Use named initializers for struct i2c_device_id Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-05-20 6:48 ` Ivan Vecera
2026-05-21 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177932943911.3832404.650041739281306010.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc==?utf-8?q?=40baylibre=2Ecom=3E?=@aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org \
--cc==?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29_=3Cu=2Ekleine-koenig?=@aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org \
--cc=Prathosh.Satish@microchip.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox