From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/5] rtnetlink: RTNL avoidance in rtnl_getlink() and rtnl_dump_ifinfo()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 02:40:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177984961239.4057662.14266234471660780599.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525083542.1565964-1-edumazet@google.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 25 May 2026 08:35:37 +0000 you wrote:
> Many shell scripts invoke iproute2 commands specifying a device by
> its name.
>
> This series improves their performance avoiding RTNL acquisition
> for their (repeated) name->index conversion.
>
> v5: fix rtnl_fill_prop_list() return value.
> v4: Addressed Sashiko's feedback.
> added 2 patches for rtnl_dump_ifinfo().
> v3: insert patch 2/3 in the series (Jakub reported a KASAN splat)
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v5,net-next,1/5] rtnetlink: use nla_nest_end_safe() in rtnl_fill_prop_list()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/73a7c8fb2302
- [v5,net-next,2/5] net: defer netdev_name_node_alt_flush() call to netdev_run_todo()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/00888feb6014
- [v5,net-next,3/5] rtnetlink: do not acquire RTNL in rtnl_getlink() with RTEXT_FILTER_NAME_ONLY
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e896e5c0734b
- [v5,net-next,4/5] rtnetlink: do not assume RTNL is held in link_master_filtered()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6768c7c3d70f
- [v5,net-next,5/5] rtnetlink: add RTEXT_FILTER_NAME_ONLY support to rtnl_dump_ifinfo()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d628604f7ea7
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 8:35 [PATCH v5 net-next 0/5] rtnetlink: RTNL avoidance in rtnl_getlink() and rtnl_dump_ifinfo() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-25 8:35 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] rtnetlink: use nla_nest_end_safe() in rtnl_fill_prop_list() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-25 8:35 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 2/5] net: defer netdev_name_node_alt_flush() call to netdev_run_todo() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-25 8:35 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 3/5] rtnetlink: do not acquire RTNL in rtnl_getlink() with RTEXT_FILTER_NAME_ONLY Eric Dumazet
2026-05-27 2:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-27 5:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-25 8:35 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 4/5] rtnetlink: do not assume RTNL is held in link_master_filtered() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-25 8:35 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 5/5] rtnetlink: add RTEXT_FILTER_NAME_ONLY support to rtnl_dump_ifinfo() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-27 2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177984961239.4057662.14266234471660780599.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox