From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, tushar.vyavahare@intel.com,
kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] selftests/xsk: Preserve UMEM view in BIDIRECTIONAL test
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178286401163.341356.4009907939641685478.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629191221.2700-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:12:21 +0200 you wrote:
> The UMEM state refactor made __send_pkts() use xsk->umem for Tx
> address generation. At the same time, the shared-UMEM Tx setup copies the
> Rx UMEM state into a Tx-local state object and resets base_addr and
> next_buffer before configuring the Tx socket.
>
> Passing that Tx-local object to xsk_configure() makes xsk->umem point to
> the zero-based Tx allocator state. This breaks the BIDIRECTIONAL test once
> the roles are switched: the same socket is then used for Rx validation, but
> received descriptors from the other logical UMEM half are checked against
> base_addr == 0. With the new UMEM bounds check, a valid address such as
> base_addr + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM is rejected as being outside the UMEM
> window.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,net-next] selftests/xsk: Preserve UMEM view in BIDIRECTIONAL test
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/333289d1690d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 19:12 [PATCH v3 net-next] selftests/xsk: Preserve UMEM view in BIDIRECTIONAL test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-01 0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178286401163.341356.4009907939641685478.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox