From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com
Cc: woojung.huh@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
richardcochran@gmail.com, pascal.eberhard@se.com,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,05/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract ptp_get_pin
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:27:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178836642589.3394541.5426419758691749867@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831-ksz-perout-v1-5-14202db763b3@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] PTP periodic-output/pin capabilities are silently zeroed for
most PTP-capable KSZ/LAN switches.
--
net: dsa: microchip: extract ptp_get_pin
This patch splits the periodic output pin selection out of
ksz_ptp_enable_perout() into a new ksz_ptp_get_pin() helper, so that an
upcoming ksz8463_ptp_enable_perout() can reuse the same algorithm. No
functional change is intended by this patch itself.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c
> index ea22601f6b26b..f97ea9d69ebc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c
> @@ -183,17 +183,11 @@ static int ksz_ptp_configure_perout(struct ksz_device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int ksz_ptp_enable_perout(struct ksz_device *dev,
> - struct ptp_perout_request const *request,
> - int on)
> +static int ksz_ptp_get_pin(struct ksz_device *dev,
> + struct ptp_perout_request const *request)
> {
> struct ksz_ptp_data *ptp_data = &dev->ptp_data;
> - u64 req_pulse_width_ns;
> - u64 cycle_width_ns;
> - u64 pulse_width_ns;
> - int pin = 0;
> - u32 data32;
> - int ret;
> + int pin;
>
> if (request->flags & ~PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -206,6 +200,25 @@ static int ksz_ptp_enable_perout(struct ksz_device *dev,
> if (pin < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + return pin;
> +}
[Severity: High]
The pin selection moved here still relies on ptp_find_pin():
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_ptp.c:ksz_ptp_get_pin() {
pin = ptp_find_pin(ptp_data->clock, PTP_PF_PEROUT, request->index);
if (pin < 0)
return -EINVAL;
}
Earlier patches in this series ("add the number of pins to chip infos" and
"add the number of periodic signals to chip infos") replaced the previously
unconditional values in ksz_ptp_set_caps() with per-chip descriptor fields:
ptp_data->caps.n_pins = dev->info->n_pins;
ptp_data->caps.n_per_out = dev->info->n_per_out;
Before the series these were caps.n_pins = KSZ_PTP_N_GPIO (2) and
caps.n_per_out = 3 for every ptp_capable switch.
At this commit, only the KSZ8563 entry in ksz_switch_chips[] sets the new
members (.n_pins = 2, .n_per_out = 3). The other entries with
.ptp_capable = true - KSZ9477, KSZ9563, KSZ8567, KSZ9567, LAN9370, LAN9371,
LAN9372, LAN9373 and LAN9374 - leave both fields zero-initialized.
Can periodic output still work on those switches? With n_per_out == 0,
ptp_perout_request() in drivers/ptp/ptp_chardev.c rejects every request:
if (perout->index >= ops->n_per_out)
return -EINVAL;
and with n_pins == 0 the loop in ksz_ptp_clock_register() initializes no pin
descriptor at all:
for (i = 0; i < dev->info->n_pins; i++) {
struct ptp_pin_desc *ptp_pin = &ptp_data->pin_config[i];
...
}
so PTP_PIN_SETFUNC cannot address any pin and the ptp_find_pin() call above
can never succeed on those chips.
Should every .ptp_capable descriptor carry its previous .n_pins = 2 and
.n_per_out = 3 values? The later patch adding KSZ8463 periodic output
support only fills in the KSZ8463 entry, so the other families appear to
remain without pins and periodic outputs after the whole series.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260831-ksz-perout-v1-0-14202db763b3%40bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 13:25 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: dsa: microchip: add periodic output support for the KSZ8463 Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: dsa: microchip: add the number of pins to chip infos Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` [net-next,01/10] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: dsa: microchip: add the number of periodic signals " Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` [net-next,02/10] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: dsa: microchip: use dynamic mask to check pulse width validity Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract PTP callbacks configuration from PTP registration Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` [net-next,04/10] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract ptp_get_pin Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract compute_width Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` [net-next,06/10] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract prepare reset Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract time update Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net: dsa: microchip: extract time adjustment Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-31 13:25 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: dsa: microchip: add periodic output support for the KSZ8463 Bastien Curutchet (Schneider Electric)
2026-09-02 16:27 ` [net-next,10/10] " netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178836642589.3394541.5426419758691749867@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pascal.eberhard@se.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox