From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: mmc@linux.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, nnac123@linux.ibm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, haren@linux.ibm.com,
ricklind@linux.ibm.com, davemarq@linux.ibm.com,
bjking1@linux.ibm.com, shaik.abdulla1@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v6,09/15] ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:10:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178845903884.3394541.9429373266253586035@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0302ff17e945a742d0f0b79265ee556e3bf66a.1788102125.git.mmc@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 2 (1) · Medium: 2 · Low: 0
- [High] The new ibmveth_poll_stopping() check placed between
napi_complete_done() and ibmveth_enable_irq() cannot prevent a…
- [High] The new oversize guard in ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame() bounds
the PHYP-reported offset+length against skb_tailroom(skb) instead of…
- [Medium] A real, user-visible sk_buff leak fix is buried inside a
199-line helper-extraction patch with no Fixes: tag and no Cc: stable.
- [Medium] All 'skip the slot' outcomes (invalid descriptor, bad
correlator, oversize offset+length) neither increment frames_processed…
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] ibmveth_remove() calls cancel_work_sync(&adapter->work) while
the netdev is still registered and RX NAPI/IRQ paths are live, then…
--
ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers
This splits the RX slot handling in ibmveth_poll() into a set of small
helpers (poll_stopping, harvest_slot, recycle_invalid, skip_bad_correlator,
drop_oversize, deliver_frame, bump_invalid) so the NAPI callback becomes a
thin budget loop. Along with the motion it adds an offset+length bounds
check before skb_put(), frees the copybreak skb on a harvest error, and
adds stopping checks so close/napi_disable does not re-arm PHYP delivery.
A few questions below.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> index 46f68f5b52e70..f726d1e3f0b11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2382,125 +2380,236 @@ static void ibmveth_rx_csum_helper(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> }
>
[ ... ]
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index, bool reuse)
> +{
> + int rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, reuse);
> +
> + return !rc || rc == -EINVAL || rc == -EFAULT;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Can this helper ever return false? ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer() documents
and returns only 0, -EINVAL or -EFAULT:
rc = ibmveth_remove_buffer_from_pool(adapter, cor, queue_index, reuse);
if (unlikely(rc)) {
/* Skip a corrupt slot without claiming pool ownership. */
if (rc == -EINVAL || rc == -EFAULT)
ibmveth_rxq_advance(rxq);
return rc;
}
so every "break" in ibmveth_poll_recycle_invalid(),
ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator() and ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize() looks
unreachable.
Combined with the budget accounting in the loop below, is there anything
left that bounds one ibmveth_poll() invocation? A skipped slot returns 0
from ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(), so neither the break nor
frames_processed++ runs:
rc = ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(napi, adapter, netdev,
queue_index);
if (rc < 0)
break;
if (rc > 0)
frames_processed++;
and each skip recycles the slot with reuse=true, after which
ibmveth_replenish_task() re-posts it. The tail of ibmveth_poll() then does:
if (ibmveth_rxq_pending_buffer(adapter, queue_index) &&
napi_schedule(napi)) {
ibmveth_disable_irq(adapter, queue_index);
goto restart_poll;
}
which re-enters the loop in the same invocation with frames_processed
unchanged. If PHYP keeps publishing skippable slots (stale ring contents,
malformed completions), does the frames_processed == budget exit ever
become reachable, and does this poll ever return?
The reset escalation in ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator() uses
schedule_work(), which queues on the current CPU via system_percpu_wq, so
would the worker be able to run while that CPU is stuck in the poll? The
ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize() path escalates nothing at all.
The commit message states:
Skipped and dropped slots do not count against the NAPI budget; only
a delivered frame does.
Is that intentional given it removes the only bound on the loop?
> +
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_recycle_invalid(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
> + netdev_dbg(netdev, "recycling invalid buffer\n");
> + ibmveth_poll_bump_invalid(adapter, queue_index);
> + return ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(adapter, queue_index, true);
> +}
> +
> +static bool ibmveth_poll_skip_bad_correlator(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + netdev_err(netdev,
> + "bad correlator on queue %d, skipping slot\n",
> + queue_index);
> + /* Residual stale slot after resize: recover via reset rather
> + * than spinning forever. Always escalate; only the log is
> + * rate-limited.
> + */
> + schedule_work(&adapter->work);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this adds another NAPI-side
producer of adapter->work while ibmveth_remove() still cancels that work
before the device is quiesced:
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->work);
for (i = 0; i < IBMVETH_NUM_BUFF_POOLS; i++)
kobject_put(&adapter->rx_buff_pool[0][i].kobj);
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
Can a poll running on another CPU call schedule_work(&adapter->work) from
here (or from the ibmveth_enable_irq() failure path in ibmveth_poll())
after cancel_work_sync() has returned? Nothing cancels or flushes it
again, and adapter is netdev_priv(netdev), so the queued work_struct and
everything ibmveth_reset() touches would be freed by free_netdev().
For the record, the ordering appears to be repaired later in this series:
at the series tip ibmveth_remove() moves the cancellation after
unregister_netdev(), with a comment that cancel_work_sync() before
unregister left a window where poll could schedule_work() and the worker
ran after free_netdev().
> + ibmveth_poll_bump_invalid(adapter, queue_index);
> + return ibmveth_poll_harvest_slot(adapter, queue_index, true);
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> +static int ibmveth_poll_deliver_frame(struct napi_struct *napi,
> + struct ibmveth_adapter *adapter,
> + struct net_device *netdev,
> + int queue_index)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + room = skb_tailroom(skb);
> + off = offset;
> + len = length;
> + if (unlikely(off >= room || len > room - off)) {
> + if (!ibmveth_poll_drop_oversize(netdev, adapter, queue_index,
> + off, len, room))
> + return -1;
> + return 0;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Should the bound here be pool->buff_size rather than skb_tailroom(skb)?
ibmveth_replenish_buffer_pool() allocates, maps and advertises exactly
pool->buff_size to the hypervisor:
skb = netdev_alloc_skb(adapter->netdev, pool->buff_size);
...
dma_addr = dma_map_single_attrs(dev, skb->data, pool->buff_size,
DMA_FROM_DEVICE, DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN);
...
descs[filled].fields.flags_len = IBMVETH_BUF_VALID | pool->buff_size;
netdev_alloc_skb() rounds up to an allocator bucket, so skb_tailroom() on
an untouched pool buffer is larger than buff_size (a 16 KiB pool buffer
lands in a 32 KiB allocation). Does a PHYP-reported off+len in the
(buff_size, tailroom] gap pass this check and then get committed and
delivered?
skb_put(skb, length);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, netdev);
...
napi_gro_receive(napi, skb);
That would hand uninitialised slab bytes outside the DMA mapping to the
stack, and on the copybreak path skb_copy_to_linear_data() plus
ibmveth_flush_buffer(skb->data, length + offset) would touch addresses
past the mapped window. The commit message says deliver "rejects a PHYP
offset+length that would skb_put() past the buffer" - is the buffer here
meant to be the hardware-visible one? The correlator has already been
validated by ibmveth_rxq_correlator_valid(), so
adapter->rx_buff_pool[queue_index][correlator >> 32].buff_size is
available as the bound.
> +
> + if (lrg_pkt) {
> + __be64 *rxmss = (__be64 *)(skb->data + 8);
> +
> + mss = (u16)be64_to_cpu(*rxmss);
> + }
> +
> + new_skb = NULL;
> + if (length < rx_copybreak)
> + new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length);
> +
> + if (new_skb) {
> + skb_copy_to_linear_data(new_skb, skb->data + offset, length);
> + if (rx_flush)
> + ibmveth_flush_buffer(skb->data, length + offset);
> + rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, true);
> + if (unlikely(rc)) {
> + kfree_skb(new_skb);
> + return -1;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
This kfree_skb(new_skb) is a real fix for an sk_buff leak that exists at
the baseline in ibmveth_poll():
new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length);
...
skb_copy_to_linear_data(new_skb, skb->data + offset, length);
...
if (unlikely(ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, true)))
break; /* new_skb is neither freed nor handed to the stack */
Could this be split into its own patch with a Fixes: tag (and Cc: stable)
so it can be routed to net and picked up by older trees? Buried in a
199-insertion helper extraction it is not separable for backporting. The
same applies to the new offset+length validation, which the commit message
describes as preventing an skb_put() past the buffer.
> + skb = new_skb;
> + } else {
> + rc = ibmveth_rxq_harvest_buffer(adapter, queue_index, false);
> + if (unlikely(rc))
> + return -1;
> + skb_reserve(skb, offset);
> + }
[ ... ]
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int ibmveth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> {
[ ... ]
> if (frames_processed == budget)
> goto out;
>
> if (!napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed))
> goto out;
>
> - /* We think we are done - reenable interrupts,
> - * then check once more to make sure we are done.
> + /*
> + * napi_disable() sets DISABLE then waits for this poll. Without a
> + * second stopping check here, enable_irq() can re-arm PHYP after
> + * resize already masked the queue; late IRQs then hit the handler
> + * after num_rx_queues was published lower (lab WARN at interrupt).
> */
> + if (ibmveth_poll_stopping(netdev, napi))
> + goto out;
> +
> rc = ibmveth_enable_irq(adapter, queue_index);
[Severity: High]
Does this check actually close the window it describes? It is a
check-then-act pair, and both predicates in ibmveth_poll_stopping() go
false exactly when teardown is finishing:
return !netif_running(netdev) || napi_disable_pending(napi);
napi_disable_locked() clears the DISABLE bit before returning:
clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state);
so napi_disable_pending() is false once close is past its wait. And
netif_running() stays true for the driver's internal close callers -
ibmveth_change_mtu(), ibmveth_set_mac_addr(), the features paths and
veth_pool_store() all do "if (netif_running(dev)) ibmveth_close(dev);".
Sequence:
CPU0 ibmveth_poll()
napi_complete_done() /* clears SCHED */
/* delayed: hard IRQ, or vCPU
dispatch preemption on a
shared-processor LPAR */
CPU1 ibmveth_change_mtu() -> ibmveth_close() -> ibmveth_cleanup_rx_interrupts()
napi_disable() /* clears DISABLE on return */
ibmveth_disable_irq(adapter, i);
synchronize_irq(adapter->queue_irq[i]);
free_irq(...)
CPU0 resumes:
if (ibmveth_poll_stopping(netdev, napi)) /* false */
goto out;
rc = ibmveth_enable_irq(adapter, queue_index); /* re-arms PHYP */
Can the queue end up unmasked after the final remask and after free_irq()
removed the handler? That is the case the commit message claims to close:
ibmveth_poll_stopping() ensures close/napi_disable does not re-arm PHYP.
Would moving the unmask before napi_complete_done(), or moving close's
final remask after synchronize_net(), be a more reliable ordering than
adding another check here? This looks unchanged at the series tip.
> if (rc) {
> netdev_err(netdev,
Thanks for looking at these.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/cover.1788102125.git.mmc%40linux.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 15:07 [PATCH net-next v6 00/15] ibmveth: Add multi-queue RX support Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/15] ibmveth: Add MQ RX hypercall wrappers and call definitions Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,01/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/15] ibmveth: Prepare MQ RX adapter data structures Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/15] ibmveth: Refactor RX resource allocation for MQ RX bring-up Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,03/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/15] ibmveth: Refactor buffer pool management for per-queue MQ RX Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,04/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/15] ibmveth: Refactor RX interrupt control for MQ RX queues Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,05/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/15] ibmveth: Refactor TX resource allocation in open/close paths Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,06/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/15] ibmveth: Add RX queue register helpers for MQ Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/15] ibmveth: Add queue-aware RX buffer submit helper " Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,08/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/15] ibmveth: Harden RX poll path with helpers Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/15] ibmveth: Enable multi-queue RX receive path Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,10/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/15] ibmveth: Add per-queue RX and TX statistics collection Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,11/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/15] ibmveth: Report MQ-aware RX counts in ethtool get_channels Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,12/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 13/15] ibmveth: Expose per-queue buffer pool details via debugfs Mingming Cao
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 14/15] ibmveth: Implement incremental MQ RX queue resize Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,14/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-08-31 15:07 ` [PATCH net-next v6 15/15] ibmveth: Complete set_channels down-path and mq_fallback max_rx cap Mingming Cao
2026-09-03 18:10 ` [net-next,v6,15/15] " netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178845903884.3394541.9429373266253586035@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjking1@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mmc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shaik.abdulla1@ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox