From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: sinyavin@gmail.com
Cc: stephan@gerhold.net, loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com,
ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wwan: qcom_bam_dmux: account network packets
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 22:24:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178856068113.219967.2076451083879151620@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830085400.2542956-1-sinyavin@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 (2) · Low: 0
- [High] Use-after-free write of the per-CPU netdev statistics from the
BAM DMA completion tasklet.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] Registered net_devices are never freed on driver removal.
- [Medium] bam_dmux_cmd_data() trims the RX skb to the modem-supplied
hdr->len (skb_trim(skb, hdr->len), qcom_bam_dmux.c:529) after only…
--
net: wwan: qcom_bam_dmux: account network packets
The patch makes the BAM-DMUX driver maintain per-CPU software statistics
so that userspace no longer sees zero traffic. TX bytes/packets are
accounted from the DMA completion callback and RX bytes/packets from the
data command handler, with dev_get_tstats64() wired up as
ndo_get_stats64.
A few questions below about the netdev lifetime in the new accounting
paths.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c b/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> index cc6ace8d6437..40c40bc5645a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> @@ -177,8 +177,15 @@ static void bam_dmux_tx_callback(void *data)
> {
> struct bam_dmux_skb_dma *skb_dma = data;
> struct sk_buff *skb = skb_dma->skb;
> + struct net_device *netdev = skb->dev;
> + unsigned int len = 0;
> +
> + if (netdev)
> + len = ((struct bam_dmux_hdr *)skb->data)->len;
>
> bam_dmux_tx_done(skb_dma);
> + if (netdev)
> + dev_sw_netstats_tx_add(netdev, 1, len);
> dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can this write into freed per-CPU memory during driver removal?
skb->dev here is a borrowed pointer with no reference taken, and
dev_sw_netstats_tx_add() expands to this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats) plus
u64_stats_add(). Once the netdev is unregistered, netdev_run_todo()
calls netdev_do_free_pcpu_stats(), which for NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_TSTATS
does:
net/core/dev.c:netdev_do_free_pcpu_stats() {
case NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_TSTATS:
free_percpu(dev->tstats);
break;
}
dev->tstats is not set to NULL there, and this runs regardless of
needs_free_netdev.
In bam_dmux_remove() the unregistration completes well before the TX
DMA channel is stopped:
drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c:bam_dmux_remove() {
unregister_netdevice_many(&list);
rtnl_unlock(); /* netdev_run_todo(): tstats freed */
cancel_work_sync(&dmux->tx_wakeup_work);
...
if (!wait_event_timeout(dmux->pc_wait, !dmux->rx, BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT))
...
bam_dmux_power_off(dmux); /* dmaengine_terminate_sync(dmux->tx) */
bam_dmux_free_skbs(dmux->tx_skbs, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
}
Is any TX descriptor completing in that window (which includes a
wait_event_timeout() of up to BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT) going to run
bam_dmux_tx_callback() with skb->dev pointing at the unregistered
netdev, and write through the already freed dev->tstats?
The presence of bam_dmux_free_skbs(dmux->tx_skbs, DMA_TO_DEVICE) at the
end of bam_dmux_remove() suggests outstanding TX skbs are an expected
state at that point. bam_dmux_netdev_stop() only stops the queue and
sends a CLOSE command, so netdev_wait_allrefs_any() has nothing to wait
on for in-flight descriptors.
There is also the deferred submit path: bam_dmux_netdev_start_xmit()
can hand work to bam_dmux_tx_wakeup_work(), which blocks in
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() (bam_dmux_runtime_resume() can wait
several seconds) and only afterwards calls bam_dmux_skb_dma_submit_tx()
and dma_async_issue_pending(). Can descriptors be submitted there
after the netdevs and their tstats are already gone?
Would accounting TX in bam_dmux_netdev_start_xmit(), where the netdev is
guaranteed live, or terminating the DMA channels and clearing
dmux->netdevs[] before unregistering, avoid this?
[ ... ]
> @@ -421,6 +429,7 @@ static void bam_dmux_netdev_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> dev->needed_headroom = sizeof(struct bam_dmux_hdr);
> dev->needed_tailroom = sizeof(u32); /* word-aligned */
> dev->tx_queue_len = DEFAULT_TX_QUEUE_LEN;
> + dev->pcpu_stat_type = NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_TSTATS;
[Severity: High]
This is the line that makes register_netdevice() allocate dev->tstats and
netdev_run_todo() free it, so it is the other half of the question above.
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced by this patch, but while
looking at bam_dmux_netdev_setup() I noticed it sets neither
dev->needs_free_netdev nor a priv_destructor, and bam_dmux_remove() only
does unregister_netdevice_queue()/unregister_netdevice_many() with no
matching free_netdev(). The only free_netdev() in the driver is the
register_netdev() failure path in bam_dmux_register_netdev_work():
ret = register_netdev(netdev);
if (ret) {
...
free_netdev(netdev);
return;
}
Since netdev_run_todo() only frees the device when dev->needs_free_netdev
is set, does every successfully registered wwan%d interface (up to
BAM_DMUX_NUM_CH) leak its struct net_device on unbind or module unload?
> @@ -533,6 +542,7 @@ static void bam_dmux_cmd_data(struct bam_dmux_skb_dma *skb_dma)
> break;
> }
>
> + dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(netdev, skb->len);
> netif_receive_skb(skb);
> }
[Severity: High]
On the RX side, netdev comes from dmux->netdevs[hdr->ch], which is never
cleared on unregister, and the only gate is:
if (!netdev || !netif_running(netdev)) {
dev_warn(dmux->dev, "Data for inactive channel %u\n", hdr->ch);
return;
}
Since this check runs on the DMA tasklet while dev_close() and
unregistration can proceed in parallel, can the check pass and
dev_sw_netstats_rx_add() then write through a dev->tstats that
netdev_run_todo() has already freed? Before this patch the same stale
pointer was only dereferenced for reads on this path.
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the length now being
counted as rx_bytes is entirely modem-supplied. bam_dmux_cmd_data()
only bounds it against BAM_DMUX_MAX_DATA_SIZE and then trims to it:
if (hdr->len > BAM_DMUX_MAX_DATA_SIZE) {
...
return;
}
...
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*hdr));
skb_trim(skb, hdr->len);
The RX buffers come from bam_dmux_skb_dma_queue_rx() and are neither
zeroed nor sized to the actual transfer:
if (!skb_dma->skb) {
skb_dma->skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(NULL, BAM_DMUX_BUFFER_SIZE, gfp);
if (!skb_dma->skb)
return false;
skb_put(skb_dma->skb, BAM_DMUX_BUFFER_SIZE);
}
bam_dmux_rx_callback() never consults a transferred length or residue,
and the buffers are reused across receives. If the modem declares
hdr->len larger than the payload it actually DMA'd, are the trailing
bytes of the reused 2 KB buffer (previous packet contents, or
uninitialized heap on first use) passed to netif_receive_skb() and now
also counted by dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(netdev, skb->len)?
I could not confirm from the BAM DMA driver whether a short transfer is
reportable at all, so this part may not be reachable in practice.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260830085400.2542956-1-sinyavin%40gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 8:54 [PATCH net] net: wwan: qcom_bam_dmux: account network packets Dmitry Sinyavin
2026-08-31 9:23 ` Stephan Gerhold
2026-08-31 13:36 ` Dmitry Sinyavin
2026-09-04 22:24 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178856068113.219967.2076451083879151620@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sinyavin@gmail.com \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox