From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/9] netfilter: cttimeout: prevent UAF during module unload
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:04:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178889064168.219967.15151233151602486944@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907171732.1407739-5-pablo@netfilter.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
- [High] cttimeout_exit() only drains RCU readers that reach the per-net
timeout storage through nf_ct_timeout_hook.
--
netfilter: cttimeout: prevent UAF during module unload
This reorders cttimeout_exit() so that nf_ct_timeout_hook is cleared and
synchronize_net() is called before unregister_pernet_subsys() frees the
per-net timeout storage. That closes the window where nf_ct_set_timeout()
could still reach the freed nfct_timeout_pernet blob through the hook.
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> index 66c2016f6049d..132c02ac7c4ea 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> @@ -652,9 +652,9 @@ static void __exit cttimeout_exit(void)
> {
> nfnetlink_subsys_unregister(&cttimeout_subsys);
>
> - unregister_pernet_subsys(&cttimeout_ops);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_ct_timeout_hook, NULL);
> synchronize_net();
> + unregister_pernet_subsys(&cttimeout_ops);
> }
[Severity: High]
Does this leave the same per-net object reachable from the netlink dump
path during unload?
cttimeout_get_timeout() starts the dump without a module reference:
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c:cttimeout_get_timeout() {
if (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) {
struct netlink_dump_control c = {
.dump = ctnl_timeout_dump,
};
return netlink_dump_start(info->sk, skb, info->nlh, &c);
}
With no .module set, __netlink_dump_start()'s try_module_get(control->module)
is try_module_get(NULL), which succeeds without taking anything, and
cb->module stays NULL. nf_tables_api.c and nfnetlink_hook.c pass
.module = THIS_MODULE in their netlink_dump_control for comparison.
ctnl_timeout_dump() reads the per-net blob that unregister_pernet_subsys()
frees, and it is not gated by nf_ct_timeout_hook:
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c:ctnl_timeout_dump() {
rcu_read_lock();
pernet = nfct_timeout_pernet(net);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(cur, &pernet->nfct_timeout_list, head) {
Is the following sequence possible?
1. IPCTNL_MSG_TIMEOUT_NEW creates one policy; cttimeout_new_timeout() does
__module_get(THIS_MODULE).
2. A NLM_F_DUMP IPCTNL_MSG_TIMEOUT_GET parks the dump: with one entry
present ctnl_timeout_dump() returns skb->len > 0, netlink_dump() queues
the skb and leaves nlk->cb_running set with cb->dump =
ctnl_timeout_dump.
3. IPCTNL_MSG_TIMEOUT_DELETE removes the policy, and ctnl_timeout_del()
does module_put(THIS_MODULE), so the module refcount is back to zero
while the dump is still parked.
4. rmmod runs cttimeout_exit(). The synchronize_rcu() inside
nfnetlink_subsys_unregister() and the new synchronize_net() only wait
for RCU read-side sections, and a parked dump is not in one, so
unregister_pernet_subsys() frees the nfct_timeout_pernet allocation and
the module text goes away.
5. The next recvmsg() on that netlink socket resumes the dump:
net/netlink/af_netlink.c:netlink_recvmsg() {
if (READ_ONCE(nlk->cb_running) &&
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) <= sk->sk_rcvbuf / 2) {
ret = netlink_dump(sk, false);
which is an indirect call through cb->dump into freed module text, and
then a read of the freed pernet->nfct_timeout_list.
Should the dump control also carry .module = THIS_MODULE so the parked
dump pins the module across the unload, given the commit is aimed at the
same freed nfct_timeout_pernet object during module unload?
Note that a dump over an empty policy list does not park: ctnl_timeout_dump()
returns 0 there and netlink_dump() finishes the dump immediately, so the
create/park/delete order above is what makes it reproducible.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907171732.1407739-2-pablo%40netfilter.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 17:17 [PATCH net,v2 0/9] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 1/9] ipvs: reject invalid states in connection template sync records Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 21:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 2/9] ipvs: fix reversed sequence option serialization Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 3/9] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix OOB read in sip_skip_whitespace() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 4/9] netfilter: cttimeout: prevent UAF during module unload Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 18:04 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-08 20:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 5/9] netfilter: nf_log: unregister loggers before per-net teardown Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 6/9] netfilter: nfnetlink_log: cope with concurrent instance destruction Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 7/9] netfilter: arp_tables: remove the 32bit compat interface Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 18:04 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-08 20:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 8/9] netfilter: ip6_tables: set F_PROTO when proto value is nonzero Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 18:04 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-08 20:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 20:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-07 17:17 ` [PATCH net 9/9] netfilter: report NLM_F_DUMP_FILTERED when all is filtered out Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178889064168.219967.15151233151602486944@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox