From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: matttbe@kernel.org
Cc: martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 05/15] mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:49:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178896537514.219967.16760487622956837996@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-3-rc1-v2-5-df1de70348b6@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1 (1)
- [Low] Residual uninitialised read of `mp_opt->csum`: the patch closes
the functional consumer of the uninitialised checksum…
Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] Reported concern (assessed as an intentional, documented
behaviour change): a passive endpoint whose local checksum sysctl is…
--
mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum
The MP_CAPABLE parser now only honours the checksum required flag for
options that do not carry a data-len, so a peer that sets the flag on a
data-bearing MP_CAPABLE without appending the 2 bytes of checksum no
longer makes the receiver use an uninitialised csum field.
Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8684#section-3.1-23 [1]
Closes: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260803-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-2-rc6-v2-0-b8f496d71664%40kernel.org?part=1
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index b8318e030138..92f27b9e087a 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static void mptcp_parse_option(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> * In other words, the only way for checksums not to be used
> * is if both hosts in their SYNs set A=0."
> */
> - if (flags & MPTCP_CAP_CHECKSUM_REQD)
> + if ((flags & MPTCP_CAP_CHECKSUM_REQD) &&
> + opsize < TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA)
> mp_opt->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD;
[Severity: Low]
The commit message says "uninitialised bytes could be used for the 'csum'
field". Is the uninitialised csum field itself still read after this
change?
In mptcp_parse_option(), mp_opt->csum is only assigned in the 24-byte
form:
if (opsize == TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA_CSUM) {
mp_opt->csum = get_unaligned((__force __sum16 *)ptr);
mp_opt->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD;
ptr += 2;
}
pr_debug("MP_CAPABLE version=%x, flags=%x, optlen=%d sndr=%llu, rcvr=%llu len=%d csum=%u\n",
version, flags, opsize, mp_opt->sndr_key,
mp_opt->rcvr_key, mp_opt->data_len, mp_opt->csum);
but the pr_debug() passes mp_opt->csum for every opsize, including the
22-byte MP_CAPABLE + data form this patch is about.
The struct is an uninitialised stack object in mptcp_incoming_options()
and in net/mptcp/subflow.c, and mptcp_get_options() only clears the
4-byte status group:
*(u32 *)&mp_opt->status = 0;
while protocol.h declares csum outside of that group:
u16 data_len;
__sum16 csum;
struct_group(status,
So when that dynamic-debug callsite is enabled, 2 bytes of stale stack
are formatted into dmesg on a remotely reachable path. The same
pr_debug() also prints sndr_key/rcvr_key/data_len for short opsizes,
so the debug-print read predates this commit; it is mentioned here
because the commit message frames the fix as removing the uninitialised
use of csum, and a stable backporter may read it that way.
Would adding mp_opt->csum = 0 (or extending the region cleared in
mptcp_get_options()) address this at the root, rather than relying on
every consumer testing OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD?
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but a question about the
passive side losing the peer's checksum requirement in one corner case.
subflow_init_req() derives the requirement from the local sysctl only:
subflow_req->csum_reqd = mptcp_is_checksum_enabled(sock_net(sk_listener));
and subflow_check_req() does not preserve OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD from the
SYN, so mptcp_sk_clone_init() is the only place where the passive side
picks up the peer's flag:
if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD)
WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, true);
With the new opsize test, a 22-byte MP_CAPABLE + data with the A bit set
no longer sets that suboption, so msk->csum_enabled stays false and
get_mapping_status() accepts the mapping without validation:
if (unlikely(subflow->map_csum_reqd != csum_reqd))
return MAPPING_INVALID;
For a Linux sender the two signals cannot diverge, since
mptcp_established_options_mp() and mptcp_write_options() both derive the
A flag and the checksum field from opts->csum_reqd, and RFC 8684 omits
the checksum field only when checksums are not in use, so only a
self-contradictory peer reaches this path. The commit message already
covers that trade-off. The gap where the peer's SYN A bit is never
stored in subflow_req is pre-existing and unchanged here.
Would it be worth a short note in the commit message that the passive
side's only source for the peer's A bit is the third ACK, so the new
condition also drops that signal for a data-bearing third ACK?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260908-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-7-3-rc1-v2-0-df1de70348b6%40kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 14:07 [PATCH net v2 00/15] mptcp: misc fixes for v7.3-rc1 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 01/15] mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:32 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 02/15] mptcp: subflow: no need to copy thmac during ulp_clone Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 03/15] mptcp: syncookies: remember the request backup flag Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 04/15] mptcp: pm: kernel: drop pending ADD_ADDR when removing ID0 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 17:57 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 05/15] mptcp: options: handle MPC data + csum reqd + no csum Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-09 18:03 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 06/15] mptcp: prevent race between disconnect() and rtx Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 18:05 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 07/15] selftests: mptcp: fix an UAF in mptcp_connect.c Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 08/15] mptcp: pm: userspace: fix address ID overflow Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 09/15] mptcp: pm: reset retrans_time when ADD_ADDR entry is reused Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 10/15] mptcp: remove unneeded READ_ONCE() annotation Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 11/15] selftests: mptcp: lib: dump nstat for the right test Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 12/15] selftests: mptcp: lib: get counters " Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 13/15] mptcp: options: fix uninit-value in mptcp_write_data_fin Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 14/15] mptcp: being below memory limit is a likely() condition Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-08 14:07 ` [PATCH net v2 15/15] mptcp: avoid pruning for OoW data Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-09 14:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 15:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 18:07 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-09 18:09 ` [PATCH net v2 00/15] mptcp: misc fixes for v7.3-rc1 Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-09 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178896537514.219967.16760487622956837996@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox