Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dinguyen@kernel.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	peppe.cavallaro@st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: allow stmmaceth-ocp reset name
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:08:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178902771990.219967.12244559692120688678@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909080559.2028-1-muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0 (1)

- [Medium] The SoCFPGA-only reset name "stmmaceth-ocp" is added
  unconditionally to the *generic* snps,dwmac.yaml second-reset slot…

Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] After this patch,
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml…

--

dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: allow stmmaceth-ocp reset name

The patch relaxes the second entry of reset-names in the generic
snps,dwmac.yaml schema so that "stmmaceth-ocp" is accepted alongside
"ahb", and removes the Arria10 TODO note from the Altera SoCFPGA DWMAC
binding description.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml
> index db93436c96fa..d8f90d36d246 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml
> @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@ description:
>    This binding describes the Altera SOCFPGA SoC implementation of the
>    Synopsys DWMAC for the Cyclone5, Arria5, Stratix10, Agilex5 and Agilex7
>    families of chips.
> -  # TODO: Determine how to handle the Arria10 reset-name, stmmaceth-ocp, that
> -  # does not validate against net/snps,dwmac.yaml.

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but after the TODO is removed
this file no longer mentions Arria10 anywhere, while the family list in
the same description block still reads:

  Synopsys DWMAC for the Cyclone5, Arria5, Stratix10, Agilex5 and Agilex7
  families of chips.

The compatible documented in this same file, altr,socfpga-stmmac-a10-s10,
is the string used by the Arria10 gmac nodes in
arch/arm/boot/dts/intel/socfpga/socfpga_arria10.dtsi.  Could Arria10 be
added to that family list along with dropping the TODO?

> 
>  select:
>    properties:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> index 2449311c6d28..c7f1a7c11c8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      items:
>        - description: GMAC stmmaceth reset
> -      - description: AHB reset
> +      - description: AHB or OCP reset
>  
>    reset-names:
>      oneOf:
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ properties:
>            - enum: [stmmaceth, ahb]
>        - items:
>            - const: stmmaceth
> -          - const: ahb
> +          - enum: [ahb, stmmaceth-ocp]

[Severity: Medium]
Should this new name be gated on the Altera compatible instead of being
allowed for every DWMAC binding?

"stmmaceth-ocp" only has one in-tree consumer,
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-socfpga.c:socfpga_dwmac_probe():

	dwmac->stmmac_ocp_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, "stmmaceth-ocp");

The generic parser, stmmac_probe_config_dt() in stmmac_platform.c, only
ever asks for the second reset by the name "ahb":

	plat->stmmac_ahb_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(
							&pdev->dev, "ahb");

Since every other DWMAC binding (mediatek, rockchip, starfive, st, qcom,
...) $refs snps,dwmac.yaml, a device tree for one of those platforms can
now write reset-names = "stmmaceth", "stmmaceth-ocp" and still pass
dt_binding_check, while no driver on those platforms looks that name up,
so that reset is never deasserted and validation reports nothing.  Would
an if/then on the compatible be preferable?  snps,dwmac.yaml already
carries such blocks (for example the compatible-gated snps,tso: false
block), and altr,socfpga-stmmac.yaml already has an allOf with an
if: on altr,socfpga-stmmac-agilex5, which looks like the natural place to
constrain the Arria10 (altr,socfpga-stmmac-a10-s10) reset naming.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      items:
>        - description: GMAC stmmaceth reset
> -      - description: AHB reset
> +      - description: AHB or OCP reset

[Severity: Medium]
Related to the above: this description now covers two different resets
with different acquisition semantics in one slot.  The AHB reset is taken
as a shared control via devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() in
stmmac_platform.c, while the OCP reset is taken as an exclusive control
via devm_reset_control_get_optional() in dwmac-socfpga.c.  Would separate
per-compatible descriptions make the contract clearer?

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260909080559.2028-1-muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade%40altera.com

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  8:05 [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: allow stmmaceth-ocp reset name muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-09-10  8:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178902771990.219967.12244559692120688678@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox