From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: edumazet@google.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
subash.a.kasiviswanathan@oss.qualcomm.com,
sean.tranchetti@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: rmnet: annotate data-races around mux_id
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 13:22:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178965135397.22033.7805558701631671967@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916132231.1780091-3-edumazet@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1
- [Low] The patch "net: rmnet: annotate data-races around mux_id"
contains, besides the READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations, a real…
--
net: rmnet: annotate data-races around mux_id
This adds READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations around priv->mux_id and
ep->mux_id, which are written under RTNL but read from the transmit and
receive paths. It also reorders rmnet_changelink() so that ep->mux_id is
published before the endpoint is inserted into its new hash bucket.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_config.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_config.c
> index 59ef8b4ce5321..248a9d822409b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_config.c
> @@ -331,11 +331,11 @@ static int rmnet_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
> }
>
> hlist_del_init_rcu(&ep->hlnode);
> + WRITE_ONCE(ep->mux_id, mux_id);
> hlist_add_head_rcu(&ep->hlnode,
> &port->muxed_ep[mux_id]);
>
> - ep->mux_id = mux_id;
> - priv->mux_id = mux_id;
> + WRITE_ONCE(priv->mux_id, mux_id);
[Severity: Low]
Beyond the annotations, the reordering here looks like a functional fix
rather than a pure cleanup. Should it carry a Fixes: tag?
With the old ordering the endpoint was visible in the new bucket while
still carrying its old mux_id, so a concurrent reader in
rmnet_get_endpoint() would reject it:
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(ep, &port->muxed_ep[mux_id], hlnode,
lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) {
if (READ_ONCE(ep->mux_id) == mux_id)
return ep;
}
return NULL;
and the RX path then frees the skb in __rmnet_map_ingress_handler():
ep = rmnet_get_endpoint(port, mux_id);
if (!ep)
goto free_skb;
The reader is driven by inbound traffic in
rmnet_rx_handler() -> rmnet_map_ingress_handler() ->
__rmnet_map_ingress_handler(), while the writer side runs from
ip link set <rmnet dev> type rmnet mux_id N, so the observable effect is
occasional packet loss during a mux_id change.
git blame points at commit 2abb5792387e ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: Allow
configuration updates to existing devices") for the previous ordering, so
would the following trailer be appropriate to help stable pick this up?
Fixes: 2abb5792387e ("net: qualcomm: rmnet: Allow configuration updates to existing devices")
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260916132231.1780091-1-edumazet%40google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 13:22 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: rmnet: lockless rmnet_fill_info() Eric Dumazet
2026-09-16 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rmnet: annotate data-races around port->data_format Eric Dumazet
2026-09-17 13:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-16 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: rmnet: annotate data-races around mux_id Eric Dumazet
2026-09-17 13:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-16 13:22 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: rmnet: no longer rely on RTNL in rmnet_fill_info() Eric Dumazet
2026-09-18 3:04 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: rmnet: lockless rmnet_fill_info() subash.a.kasiviswanathan
2026-09-18 22:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178965135397.22033.7805558701631671967@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.tranchetti@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=subash.a.kasiviswanathan@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox