From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: lgs201920130244@gmail.com
Cc: bharat@chelsio.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ganeshgr@chelsio.com, arjun@chelsio.com, leedom@chelsio.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix FW SGE queue cleanup on remove
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:53:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178966759183.22033.12309574104783604934@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916025215.2780658-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] Incomplete fix: the CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE-gated release of the
probe-time FW SGE queues is corrected only in remove_one(); the…
--
cxgb4: fix FW SGE queue cleanup on remove
The patch adds a branch to remove_one() so that the FW SGE queues
allocated by setup_fw_sge_queues() during init_one() are released when
CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE was never set, for example when no interface of the
adapter was ever opened.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> index 1ced6df6eac8c..146419c663488 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_main.c
> @@ -7116,6 +7116,9 @@ static void remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> if (adapter->flags & CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE)
> cxgb_down(adapter);
> + else if (adapter->sge.fw_evtq.desc ||
> + adapter->sge.intrq.desc)
> + t4_free_sge_resources(adapter);
[Severity: Medium]
The same CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE assumption that this patch corrects in
remove_one() also exists in the PCI reset pair eeh_reset_prepare() /
eeh_reset_done(). Should that path be fixed too?
eeh_reset_prepare() only releases SGE resources through the same gate:
for_each_port(adapter, i)
if (adapter->port[i]->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
cxgb_close(adapter->port[i]);
...
if (adapter->flags & CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE)
cxgb_down(adapter);
cxgb_close() does not free SGE resources and does not clear
CXGB4_FULL_INIT_DONE, so on an adapter that was probed but never opened
the FW queues stay allocated across the reset.
eeh_reset_done() then re-runs the allocation unconditionally:
err = setup_fw_sge_queues(adapter);
if (err) {
dev_err(adapter->pdev_dev,
"FW sge queue allocation failed, err %d", err);
return;
}
Does this leak the previous fw_evtq (and intrq in the MSI/INTx case)
ring? setup_fw_sge_queues() overwrites s->fwevtq_msix_idx after taking a
fresh index from cxgb4_get_msix_idx_from_bmap(), and t4_sge_alloc_rxq()
overwrites the ring pointer without looking at or releasing an existing
one:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c:t4_sge_alloc_rxq() {
...
iq->desc = alloc_ring(adap->pdev_dev, iq->size, iq->iqe_len, 0,
&iq->phys_addr, NULL, 0,
dev_to_node(adap->pdev_dev));
if (!iq->desc)
return -ENOMEM;
...
}
So the old dma_alloc_coherent() ingress ring becomes unreachable, the
previously reserved bit in adapter->msix_bmap is never returned via
cxgb4_free_msix_idx_in_bmap(), and the old firmware ingress queue context
is never released with t4_iq_free(). This repeats on every reset of the
pf == 4 function (sysfs reset, FLR, VFIO reset), and once the msix bitmap
is exhausted setup_fw_sge_queues() returns -ENOMEM and eeh_reset_done()
bails out, leaving the adapter unrecovered.
The new branch in remove_one() cannot recover those allocations, since
their only pointers were already overwritten during the reset.
Would an unconditional t4_free_sge_resources() at both teardown sites be
simpler? t4_free_sge_resources() already performs the same checks
internally:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/sge.c:t4_free_sge_resources() {
...
if (adap->sge.fw_evtq.desc) {
free_rspq_fl(adap, &adap->sge.fw_evtq, NULL);
...
}
...
if (adap->sge.intrq.desc)
free_rspq_fl(adap, &adap->sge.intrq, NULL);
...
}
and init_one()'s out_free_dev label already calls it unconditionally:
out_free_dev:
t4_free_sge_resources(adapter);
Could the changelog also mention the reset path, so that a backporter
knows whether the identical lifecycle mismatch there was considered?
>
> if (adapter->flags & CXGB4_USING_MSIX)
> free_msix_info(adapter);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260916025215.2780658-1-lgs201920130244%40gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 2:52 [PATCH] cxgb4: fix FW SGE queue cleanup on remove Guangshuo Li
2026-09-17 17:53 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178966759183.22033.12309574104783604934@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=arjun@chelsio.com \
--cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox