Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	weiwan@google.com, horms@kernel.org, caixinchen1@huawei.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 0/2] net: fix SO_RESERVE_MEM socket type restriction and value bounds
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:40:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179064960453.229594.15099300870054423023.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925135244.3715196-1-edumazet@google.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:52:42 +0000 you wrote:
> This series fixes two issues with SO_RESERVE_MEM and adds a kselftest suite:
> 
> - Patch 1 restricts sock_reserve_memory() to TCP sockets (sk_is_tcp(sk))
>   instead of sk_has_account(sk), and caps the requested reservation to
>   SZ_1G in sk_setsockopt(SO_RESERVE_MEM).
> 
>   Currently, sk_has_account(sk) allows SO_RESERVE_MEM on UDP sockets,
>   where sk->sk_forward_alloc is protected by sk->sk_receive_queue.lock
>   rather than the socket lock, and udp_rmem_release() does not account
>   for sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk). Concurrent UDP packet processing and
>   setsockopt(SO_RESERVE_MEM) corrupt sk_forward_alloc and memcg
>   accounting. In addition, values near INT_MAX overflow 32-bit signed
>   int in sk_mem_pages(delta) and (pages << PAGE_SHIFT).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,net,1/2] net: restrict SO_RESERVE_MEM to TCP sockets and cap max value
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/37e02c42a00b
  - [v2,net,2/2] selftests/net: add SO_RESERVE_MEM test
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25 13:52 [PATCH v2 net 0/2] net: fix SO_RESERVE_MEM socket type restriction and value bounds Eric Dumazet
2026-09-25 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/2] net: restrict SO_RESERVE_MEM to TCP sockets and cap max value Eric Dumazet
2026-09-28 17:23   ` Wei Wang
2026-09-25 13:52 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/2] selftests/net: add SO_RESERVE_MEM test Eric Dumazet
2026-09-28 17:22   ` Wei Wang
2026-09-28 18:27     ` Eric Dumazet
2026-09-28 19:54   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 20:03     ` Eric Dumazet
2026-09-28 20:18       ` Wei Wang
2026-09-29  2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179064960453.229594.15099300870054423023.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=caixinchen1@huawei.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox