From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2EF9344036; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790666678; cv=none; b=hVsNAp9fyBARrPT4CTBVykgyJJ5iQ3WNV0Xa7v2M2soYxd3OeR5N835LNEq0zjy6NHgG4YiOqQzQqvjoSvtp31o5xklO1Ja2scn6dZF88L2Kjjzkwuie38DxTTSVF8hdeYQL0GGhuIiYaYsxBj1QGmlgSXq+bN831SHAZhpZTuY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790666678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T80pmibn7aSi6N9hDzJvCBDoLXDCN4HDH9fhrQVJ60g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=MlPaaxfH79q1vrzawx5Gz5dGs2v04LQgUTZUWK2W9uHJreI1TS9rroAOT7V3PrvsCPoA2hmBJjCclUyujxk+VqTQnL78/XOc1th8W1l4kZOHscDVJjeLRU/rLWRVTBArI7apT2vqVdONME79YtUp/gLmRvj97svQhgQoCri6EKs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ORul1xW9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ORul1xW9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA4B81F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:24:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790666677; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ORul1xW9USuUDjtn8B3qbLkIBR+R47hz9P3yPidY48GRn803DHgTJ+QMx5QbqfvMS ZYRm+jFx1sKfk9eUgOCp5fb9VuTXS4XqZi8sPkYqJxCpS5SkOeZ5f2qFLQqBx4sN3B oRAFJtLePKANnTIeCHoxZwBSXft1IeiEXSVzkRD7d3BPBor1fzAHVtHLzSkm5vRjnm VMPrNw4tqqrGzyIEOusNLpLKgow3oQT/b93KXU/VIJoktSazn5DT59Z62TGK6yExnY QrqGOSJXWZrQ36A3gBo717mNumXNDXMW+W3CVQ05eprC9gBvu1K79T8PUxGt5iQPY3 9+sOg/V7h7q8A== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Aring , David Teigland , gfs2@lists.linux.dev, John Fastabend , Jakub Sitnicki , Sabrina Dubroca , Jiayuan Chen , Matthieu Baerts , Mat Martineau , Geliang Tang , mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Wen Gu , Dust Li , "D. Wythe" , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , NeilBrown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Allison Henderson , rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, Philipp Reisner , Lars Ellenberg , Christoph =?utf-8?q?B=C3=B6hmwalder?= , Jens Axboe , drbd-dev@lists.linux.dev, Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Ilya Dryomov , Alex Markuze , Viacheslav Dubeyko , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/9] tcp: avoid struct socket cache line miss in tcp_check_space() Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 07:24:34 +0000 Message-ID: <179066667444.31693.3326934466907750947@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260929071743.23624-1-edumazet@kernel.org> References: <20260929071743.23624-1-edumazet@kernel.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.