From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B433C28B7EA for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790893147; cv=none; b=QyjkFQI+On0vLkfBpJejK89TDCzKX7KGsfn4pw32UCKTkAjwtXi8GS7+BwN0QsOGl/EAZSImyjzuALwfiioTPFkimTuWWZfncvdYtAIDnFs/4A7h7argH7KAuXiVBMyNs27Im/DgiEY0tBOlw7Tx4WuB7mw2W8RCxFMIGQ2qgOk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790893147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=MJhTiExvC5btKkaZGILoM6Vsq/codmDEQ3xd5QqdLTBr1UdgQy1xSnp8KdhKSgQDCN6FbVJIyWqP4f3rOnGrRkq+v9HnpvrB7gI/dFHrtD5ltXt0IN2zOWLMWNtr5VeED1QsuS/A3mRBsgDnRybMgyOI8WJgnMRpkPYjlAqNTr0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OS5GTJm3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OS5GTJm3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A25381F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:19:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790893146; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OS5GTJm3GIOrDmZm4MihkTlNp65ud0J6AxF3vc3XwLXwxD1p8nW84kf78sb4NRmQv 7d1efMX07Jff6DhjNi2MkLabY/K9h+GdRQeuTFRq73/06bkiqvOOLKxPxtKBZJRg/P 7RfDMqNqldGogtS6BmLH9qwrLfMbGPbaX07/YuORqX8cJRdzx1cWEyUX2IeLosfWEM RjtA9+CZ1b5z5VyAoU3M+WLmUuRxd8ApSemkJFCE0WuRkxiRtvpYIahsBHcGtrnRqH Jmh0VdagTqZtUzjTet4kPK/febzsqWygFugaMq0Z21fsVwjUebTPdBxRwzT1/klu/P ad9NZr/elRNLA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Jiayuan Chen , edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Xinyang Ge Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:19:05 +0000 Message-ID: <179089314514.1402591.12516832232538534095@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261001221253.2964024-1-edumazet@kernel.org> References: <20261001221253.2964024-1-edumazet@kernel.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.