From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4A749B5AE; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790960302; cv=none; b=nvYhfYOj5G/hE1DlmvAbyjpL+tSCISHUXAmAAPemld9yBybLvmNMzRg9WTzFmuxI1O71/9A0nJREpUWF3MEF1OijFRKZ5sqoqjjKJ3bpANGhP9en3Y5REHqPYnrPX0Ed4mbexhxo15dq0781TD1XCnB9XvscvQL6EKDr+i+V5uA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790960302; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=T4fZ8RWZGiM3Kwbd2+mWWkM1hS2y9ER9c+bEhLkUAqzWF4kXDgWjeW5ej32KIvfn+gpwddVt5nSky3DnOE+Pp3yNGGlHmZRZKLiWIl5g4/X45lc1CLM3mdZEHFhTD5Tq1wM2s8HErTGBPazSd3l3qgPypDUE++49+9gCzDYMhjg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NhHy0AIk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NhHy0AIk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F23511F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 16:58:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790960301; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NhHy0AIk68LgeKarkc8VvXo0O/mgV7oVLPwrCYlD5NnxS6A7dDKCr2zog9+v+m0S7 k0NsJH/FhSY1ztcMfpLjKdA6Tr9RxoWZInFcbyfwGZVGKWLmdYC42102a4fRcmr9IA b+/VhzZCdqtXfgub0e1UiRtdVrd5Twtvq87Rn+h+SjgVqEhd7YvuERnAPrzbMD7+Kq UQsyeU8ZtOVpaxwyp/KmNXRypUR7zLLi28BaEKv9IeQqvpTwnp1t052r9L0ZFOKQ10 q9cLvsmwqQPgQL/DKy3rm+M6+kVjsZalJofDkX9J0hgWTQJBgwGPCp19hdNLxCMbxg l6NHk+jFs+OeQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com> Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: conntrack: reject nested ctnetlink master chains Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:58:20 +0000 Message-ID: <179096030049.1402591.385400063757168849@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261002165601.1754467-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> References: <20261001180224.1018290-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> <20261002165601.1754467-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.