From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9EFE3B47DD; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 07:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791099506; cv=none; b=NBIX5AzbQSS6CmQ5Gmvln/f03B4mxOdaUo6WZqLmLmC+2toDLqqsS3oWHP7CIN23uVbmx1e3yA8jW0GwoMO5UTxHJqDlKlntR6S7plfMQaX3vYBd4NGCMxYqpCP1oncrnaaAsDh3vGjaICfTGaXx4mIR2ajO4EnJuWv4eYU1oXE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791099506; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=NxCSMGMsMY3h3dwHKeguWrUL7vBA+rChCxpAsbFLUFUFR1pMfFheb1eAKXC24wycHtrRvOBsYstr5+EONmMfSENRoRDfl152ac6enzcMFFQIBZdsYm/rzLWmTNBiaPexRExtzfcteugHj8HG/ptOrywo1Y2IYdh5H0absaFH+u8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OB3hF4nR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OB3hF4nR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D18151F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 07:38:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791099502; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=OB3hF4nRRTDE9HGQMu9tgrJ+03IosrXfm14FDQrOVB2pj9eIRDI3eW/lCYRzQCwwh MdOSjMO/BZRIw04GlDgKAFbxbrwVofvPrIjrVtKK2ZLkuHc1pBs818pGsCgze0d5mS 4rClTNRNOiCocDHUai9HyHvSS/EpRtFoyNlQpbCB3mzPT0kwvaLijp3pj+OxgSNOxH Za5DCaaHCZ4KwNwH63siVlNKBi8ATpihSapunwqoz1qIfGCCkqRXr1zIy31F71O9BX xXzkqhDsrGXktgrpWTpIgk6XsJ2s477KkvyIHwTXdMnubGTCbFQ1J5SiY7oGVOK0j3 2wDibTNGi9T4g== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Eugenio =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A9rez?= , Xuan Zhuo , Will Deacon , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] vhost/vsock: size receive SKBs from declared payload Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:38:21 +0000 Message-ID: <179109950139.1402591.1046148962104624000@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261004073419.4039011-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> References: <20261004073419.4039011-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.