From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6002D2D23A6 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 17:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791134699; cv=none; b=GwJOj46CaRBvDB/knN3qseEv8Y+FqiXeZmfod1Q5qX/b6PBr1298l8q1hS9OR/q6zRmX+API0WlxQvZlOUBFfD0V3ZkErEp6oiacgPnt57cIiAjryQD/ezwX/w4PoOSrsBJSG6Xc3pA7wExP+9y7uEPuV7bzEKSVVIDGYj9N9P4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791134699; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=tYYkTZjh2wM5Q3UA+ke5RGh/DCaRPv9nEAmTrxtv4adh8j2XTfx2W2jHimGcG7ClGpqIj5KvYqazPnGJpsCEg1bHZLhDadmHn2P0wIbhRU4Ke8oNo0KeiPy0KwtKyEJ5cM8t/cReW2EmZ4Mg5VdB4YZy8Tbz98n5B/KgDVKSd5Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GU/L3bWQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GU/L3bWQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB8C01F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 17:24:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791134698; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=GU/L3bWQHSys4/n1L/huKiGBOSxqcz9AjXkQjUAiyy4f2eiz43a7BhX1nGApcXErE esRaTyTVsEPR/rjeoRZYMR2BPc55or1HpIcEHNymjo4bss+lzzFujnkjf/wZ6/1bPp 0lwHKDEpPg2WKejx9LYIxLM/uHnuiWAuzodQ0RObuGFyjrJuB2AZuSjG4QzHx48yoT t2vbnd2KauD7d1/5Sam9KUbMKfBwocxnP2723UAQG4thSxrDaYgRF76g8WCgszEsDN Ohp59UPUDU8wLQORVTnpLkRk8tJSAo1BUAGblaOs5xEeGZO0AX0SAMU2mAOMYJwvrI CtOrCGh0heOAA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, daniel@iogearbox.net, Willem de Bruijn Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/packet: ignore timestamp bits when testing tx frame status Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 17:24:57 +0000 Message-ID: <179113469733.1402591.8712402637621399147@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261004171847.186954-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> References: <20261004171847.186954-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.