Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: lucien.xin@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, quic@lists.linux.dev,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, metze@samba.org,
	mbuhl@openbsd.org, tfanelli@redhat.com, hepengtao@xiaomi.com,
	dreibh@simula.no, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, pc@manguebit.org,
	linkinjeon@kernel.org, tom@talpey.com,
	kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	jlayton@kernel.org, steved@redhat.com, hare@suse.de,
	aahringo@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, matttbe@kernel.org,
	mail@johnericson.me, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
	illiliti@protonmail.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
	marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, daniel@haxx.se,
	andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com, mef@scarletmail.rutgers.edu,
	paul@jakma.org, kuniyu@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v16 13/15] quic: add timer management
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:05:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179133512635.434549.6258447143844661377@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af1b489d765e3e585eec7d3ffd621273fea8d7d6.1791227050.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.

Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:

- [Low] The Signed-off-by chain of commit "quic: add timer management"
  does not follow Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

--

quic: add timer management

This patch adds struct quic_timer to manage the five QUIC timers: loss
detection, delayed ACK, path validation, PMTU probing and pacing. It
provides common reset, start and stop helpers. Expirations that happen
while the socket is owned by the user are deferred and handled in
quic_release_cb().

> Signed-off-by: Tyler Fanelli <tfanelli@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but is the Signed-off-by chain in the right order?

The author is Xin Long, but the first Signed-off-by is Tyler Fanelli's.
There is no Co-developed-by: tag either.

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst says:

  SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took
  as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with
  the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author.

It also says:

  Since
  Co-developed-by: denotes authorship, every Co-developed-by: must be
  immediately followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author.

If Tyler Fanelli co-developed this patch, should this line go directly
before his Signed-off-by?

  Co-developed-by: Tyler Fanelli <tfanelli@redhat.com>

If he didn't, his Signed-off-by is in the wrong place.

Other patches in the series have the same pattern:

- "quic: add path management" (Tyler Fanelli)
- "quic: provide quic.h header files for kernel and userspace" (Tyler
  Fanelli, Stefan Metzmacher, Thomas Dreibholz)
- "quic: add crypto key derivation and installation" (Pengtao He,
  Moritz Buhl)
- "net: build socket infrastructure for QUIC protocol" (Pengtao He)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/cover.1791227050.git.lucien.xin%40gmail.com

             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-07  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-07  1:05 netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-05 19:03 [PATCH net-next v16 00/15] net: introduce QUIC infrastructure and core subcomponents Xin Long
2026-10-05 19:04 ` [PATCH net-next v16 13/15] quic: add timer management Xin Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179133512635.434549.6258447143844661377@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@haxx.se \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dreibh@simula.no \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hepengtao@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=illiliti@protonmail.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mail@johnericson.me \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbuhl@openbsd.org \
    --cc=mef@scarletmail.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@jakma.org \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=quic@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=tfanelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox