From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B9E356757; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 17:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791394484; cv=none; b=As6P4YGnOcGUbSQwndwLTXlO88lTtpSEaHlocmXPFGV7AoEIzXDzMI/cou7UVhVYdxF2dTUtkFY6zD0/IjKH1oMcIrtvLaieH42lbvfqzsEq+ndaFvydVPKTDANH6lD1lcdtneHoX30LjqlaQ1g5I7gv8bMBu0b52BTeFq2NpQo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791394484; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=caw9rG1yF3iA+ktkLoOhMxxZPkq5fXMwokJAnA7J3Sr7W3x0xcJLnTcnKid3rls2Rvr3e8hrEFO0Xu3egOXuuJDKISp8skYUd3/wB2tfVIyEApLdOA9fzi9rNlP+eFvSglcTVKkiOpmpgmd5fY1oT9LoGDos2ZUnBUmp5caqA14= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NIcUcrCO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NIcUcrCO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DB1A1F000FF; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 17:34:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791394483; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NIcUcrCOQDrNxZixirPNjMKOr7K0Uq78ti1X7n6LzXM1uZQVjRAjXombYh2jygVMk NJ190M7v7slbyPPFXbfmpb3GCzdkgqvZ5SuDKGPXncsI+6FSII2e+Dv+dKIe/3hpGu BeDssMoraBRg03AfKw8pa/fChtqxtDh4aTBhtWRCz+jII8JaRLKvoC61F/QTIxINg9 M+Rv9NB7+cdmMrBwSYwGNksH029belR8qP6ifrWRN+EIdf4zMxHaX8o4M3yqO0NZO/ en8IJzUWf1Qj13GAe1r61/WvRPvd+VuFbbm8uDbXCrZHPfgS4kph1eiGBRZ3T6h9HO DVJe58TzVcLfA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Josef Bacik Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , Kaiyuan Zhang , Mina Almasry , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't leave stale bytes in skb_copy_and_csum_bits() Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 17:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: <179139448190.2527009.17897220638829712578@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261007-b4-skb-copy-csum-stale-bytes-v1-1-adbbde033fb3@toxicpanda.com> References: <20261007-b4-skb-copy-csum-stale-bytes-v1-1-adbbde033fb3@toxicpanda.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.