From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D873838D402; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791476640; cv=none; b=rnCsy33AdzDEsJ4JwJajn4G2i8+n1gkdZ+jgGN+3LuCirQ72fFB/SnRoU1Mfq3NSGB56NC+xjtKEJISNVzuDW7QPU81KnKVunnKXyC5HeUjFhWJWg1R58GA8b2kt8pgKRGPCHhljxsHNeaEAz0+NrHDsaCBCnqN0n9ZZ2NRjyrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791476640; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DxOA3K04TdGKgV9RBzwq7NMB042SfZvdvrNpiga7nYU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=IMR9tlJ9feze5vaoU6lE3pUaSr7bb2eZKe5ZhAs1teo1b8Sc0Ic2hDp+rZLhUrHjEEwdIOLyCaFFouMoqv3PK9ovGUcSAGVPJN2RQ51vfU5HN5QJS6qj8HcirEW2FU0QF5dWBFqDvPn//czMKwtUwWPqNMMm09imh+s/dMTWusg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XT/Ya97w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XT/Ya97w" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDCF01F000FF; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:23:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791476639; bh=URC7r36kokGjXCV5G6Ei8oKV54JoMbconYpCKkPt2AY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=XT/Ya97wt/ULznEJCAlPkwAU9bOesozVXQr2zbEMh7I4uyUMwJvvGsWV7XzTFjbAL atYl9dTTBZJZqX9CVr25PAHDri7vS7VhFLW95VE/9u6VWnddWwnGXG3u1Dx0H1DGHJ cCtqOW4/XmhyCeHiYKMjxkHxky3GWs8Ta8s9yipIIVSDrsocTweue/jOxrDLh5vybs Gfthxlcij7Jn+nWDn1Lsf1gHSp0qkGNXvdUVx5rrVOcs4TaTp/0rfBjNGE5WGLNm5R Jn9L5KEjlxsBBnIuYSe6RJZdRlaR+O25tUAif3yqRaaa63ppNa6kgjcYS7eSFp2nLP Havn2KKqCRmSg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Haotian Zhang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: winbond-840: release IRQ on alloc_ringdesc() error path Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:23:58 +0000 Message-ID: <179147663850.2527009.3579752858238787977@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261008162109.2678143-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> References: <20261008162109.2678143-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.