From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D224E1C61 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791554076; cv=none; b=Tv+40EpxgRdyLrLCkXxEQZ2O5bRfjSzrYgNqQvyh95zR+uTWN7obm+sJ38aJ3q/pRJ4Xx4BSW2/O0nnSjGLecX1twCjlR4IrpJbTrA+sYxaupH2QFWVC8OeirnbME6zuAvCiYlD94553s30gPKN96wdyf4CXWw4wKSVNO11D/EY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791554076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=qSiZE6jkYcc5KPCJ5Vj3GiP8Pfy+r4W8MUGmU5vfjT+HNgBRvfdY9RV2D9PhqyrXzLlz1xI6oWDnBelwU56uWGAF5KQsmH81Q7aGdCYfx3Ljlk+QL5fKaV3aTMxM/epqBaGbIFZpHZ/upTU+sbiAddDyVPKTwnhzmx5tFA+J+VE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mlpNkoXw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mlpNkoXw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C92D01F0089D; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:54:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791554074; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=mlpNkoXwVciuEkf777ufUktHfDrtr20nCxoyiOOpWhCFf6ImTJIeL9tw3VXfkeDU8 jkyNk+CU3Bilefi5f5EpZfQYfVkct5cq14QUcq7aMfEQWB2BFEuRwTLwIwofhyMG+S 1F4QufONLEKStWaTxegs9XzR8r/zWTpm4J0s+hHtdfOCivRRJCVJDCJbWTyUbyhwxT xpvhPfUcVk7GcEPO9gSfAQqJlJFxNlDmQz4jb5b/eb1SNzdT9Yft7Xcz7KdG9E7HlU N6K/Xge+vjKKP8dk/v44iTi1aIl59NbD4WJWLxrzcfjH3us5DBAaJi+oAemRH1+oP2 3JE+1+yJwnpPA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Sung Byeongchan Cc: Sabrina Dubroca , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] macsec: reject frames after receive PN exhaustion Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 13:54:33 +0000 Message-ID: <179155407332.2527009.17772945284795940148@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261009135109.718408-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> References: <20261009135109.718408-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.