From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3199321F2D; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 11:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791717550; cv=none; b=qg1MgZutPC34EkusBYVw9+Luy2+ZQ0qIfR7qau2WDU4Ys2h6vA6rvKYJPJq4oba9MPGTz5FIYJBHG27Pc5ZVOYKIJS7yMs7cY5Suh+IAjyNmW4GMVl8UesYW2PnusE0DkvZR0OYmqB0RgIqbbvZhML7fvyttvrisGpYEKOTWol8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791717550; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=I1C2ZHsvQC4SxWvHxUlQTi0I0J4DZGdrNtqXT/nLDCC6cAuup+BQMBq4AU0PZTD8t7k/PKx8hIlZKIidXIvlo+4Q7GEubvmAInIbKBIWz1fZ4u2+64/vJJRAI0HgHFNvzIOq99IyKl/191hRUCof3qWNSh1QrlQKHTe+GD/2fco= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Yo9fuhlG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Yo9fuhlG" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A900D1F0089B; Sun, 11 Oct 2026 11:19:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791717549; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Yo9fuhlGDub3oHOZ2WZc09oK5Tj7iyOLk9t+sN6XgEyNaNle0q251wDihqn1Q38Ui uP3wuImKTTT7QgU/0QoyzjMfLULSOPP2Z06QQdOY90H0j+7F8FI4U1+cVaMR6aiXyF mmVXeGNkYtYY579426vzFz6/Nsx1NXjdpZVf80vBKnTszX2aQDTTvGk7nT5pwowwvF 9yDHvABvO4ca0vWE+K0XRjibvqBDgAz2EtQPQpxGhqfqHuFdOa6JvoBpXBsp1JkWDh InV4zZzR/TBTIB1huRPPSLWZU+uerQxkzoZdhJUbItI0cb2w05xf2YJOvhnbjeNTg0 QlwTcFhYSWRVg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Shashank Mohan Jain Cc: Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "David S. Miller" , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] tcp: keep the route window on the SYN when SO_RCVBUF is set before connect Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 11:19:08 +0000 Message-ID: <179171754826.2527009.561712354727529429@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261011111606.14753-1-jain.sm@gmail.com> References: <20261011111606.14753-1-jain.sm@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.