From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A20F52E06EF; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791862166; cv=none; b=a0YS4+36uWOCqkGIk4PtkXA9LhrfeTen8j0Ul7noQMs6pCHDiOwmy8pXUSKQEeg5kaFnD1rzC8+cCeBJUfp5fCcM11gEUDA8JwavRePU9QX1XXtI6QzTVMrNn120HZYjHnxJJ0Eh4sG+m32oZaPHKxms4H5IKpYBE+lyuJp+61M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791862166; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=NtZKaS6IujJwdfx5A/BI/zSX/St4CLN352OPwRIjfjrySOKWFacygD/VMK7ZiMZw9l+5ipAS8NaaBF71QvqmMNvmJEDkQR6czYb6upQTxL1VqFAqaTXGb1wTF6Vz1UZ06+lIwKS3Z/Xjx2z8e+eig36U79cOx6n3nRbpecZSrH4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bYnFXpkM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bYnFXpkM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75D561F000FF; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:29:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791862165; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=bYnFXpkMNtiJAML/w5KxQ7cWKsQmhDiXM0x2NnhfiuPdxn0wwg4B8979yGVrhm4q+ FLXRfZaHWovuTgweq1Hm75MNV5WL9DemVgdYkF3vmm22EAEV9XHoaf4dcVBW0Igf7G odjTRBgGLAeXYRUaabEeqR+y914M8nKO/LQbvJ6j4LnHdzZ2RNmbGpumvAoRRk4i6t 3YpVp7K6dTrZFv9FataZdyCB0yhydd/JHGiYc2AtwjN1xsIBkOp0nMEOunrab6SWP5 og12dum1A+fZsX+D0GymRrCqwATX9Bz7LxeDhNyKnOB9szypR5Zk7P46KfvU719gzt gVpF3L27+B7Uw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Vincent Mailhol , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: rockchip_canfd: stop bus-off restart before closing the device Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:29:23 +0000 Message-ID: <179186216396.2527009.17545175870858054500@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.