From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D36A4315F; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791981964; cv=none; b=aQT65c3q+AGIzgzCoRjGxGfQWxvy1k4X8NIpUscondzzHEyNhozRVcCXnS3sSwSgV3EJ3toISsFwdH4czXIluCa5SzmQej+ubYfdYTrFhX5Uc6pDj5iR2hIO5u/Wabe4bM/19GUuUfRnQ2B75HYKBzwmPy9VIbJQKQ1ItoHNYco= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791981964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=f5XnjCOd/jm2OVCSth6dFw2RWP1/gqDg2wH1UK93F3TwYaQefgzsSEi6p8BMImxl9ALTkBfcW6T7fVkNKnGcrD5utTBcq4bEcLlI3lGR5byqRRutXbgKDXxyiHqb//GH2fb3zv1Ubi9L2CBEoGtdQ9R7FGHUN61PmJuXykcql4g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=miWazjcE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="miWazjcE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1DF01F000FF; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:45:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791981952; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=miWazjcEd8o6W7xBfcqS+inHJ2uA5jOgbNj0CBz8EUnBYU8tygzNj7O7+sparbU/i kiiWco4mznTZVKKU/M7KsXpDtNaPG40qey9VHg//FYYcOPPH9RTApQa5eKNBNT5ySW JflKYp0Ror3GegdLeFPAAy2eew6FDFRuQTp7ciYSCsW3dbDjwHhQ1KBsfbuP+O3l2v 36ShOImou0OQc796O74Vdyq02iUKnCe0ikuAz4kjkLbBgQABi75FWPlAwSdq3EdDvj Hs5tMvF7pIeWhCoG4Z1n4OCgczBn19ND+/QcTY+O3ewh8sfHZ1IGiTvjVOS+QRVo41 xd7gH5lCCyjKw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Ali Firas Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org, roopa@nvidia.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] vxlan: vnifilter: bound a single request and account per-VNI memory Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 12:45:51 +0000 Message-ID: <179198195143.320699.13010054612385762312@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261014123814.388557-1-alishmery18@gmail.com> References: <20261014123814.388557-1-alishmery18@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.