From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3B454B1C6 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791989017; cv=none; b=p+ScCSqReV6KnqKC29CHcGaQZiSM9u0Oyyy+fxLsC4ub9bI1MY0C8DbfgcSdrJUNDhYU5ba69u+d1Wv1joc0K+EK5L9U5Ycm/Dcs7ZstmHL42Yvv9fyJW2kR2kHHHB/z3h9SiAC9lORPOuZvMC8CKIaFZS9Mvly4e+t9S3web8c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791989017; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=VL7qbgpimvGbJvQr9wgjfOgCFMSOSSUzxEVmwzq9RM2t3VDeSI0t0oZimVGaFMTEqt9XRYj235kkt7uPK/8xIWRUnRP05OdFuJDBU2PAYKPa/1I/Sk88WMSkOv1cAxtix/W5jgJi1jSJK8tUgseSkYO2BgUSkI/KsJNGRIvJDX4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jHrhcy8f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jHrhcy8f" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BB121F000C4; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791989014; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=jHrhcy8ffdbYgPUA1irFHbjbLKA2t3BqDpdZtRRwtZxbyIPq2WPsWRcx1rBQTc3kP MvTB6DG3iaLmB0ns3OWtCOpeCog3X2GB0sVbDz8PQ8tO6Lh6ZqlyF+2AKMUweN7rXb 3HGS8aLLgu2xocRYC9nE415FETFzTHa7ZncxGxoPam98gzZozUbZmIU7Y4biC1yvKp SyGVNrfj1RISdLK7OPakZ52rUNdpXNJgMJJswbFMQt+u2LCWs1jR/B6pGjZd1c7inZ oyNwuhU5hoJjvIkqPUecYFRN404k7CHGIf8HN4jwua9IiCgB3wnkuPW08svTYPCLLv ow6Zs469ttjsA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jiale Yao Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] team: reject CAN, IEEE 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN devices in team_port_add Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:43:33 +0000 Message-ID: <179198901397.399038.11366807934508541241@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261014143309.284388-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net> References: <20261014143309.284388-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.