From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A65D4A68A7; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792055036; cv=none; b=FntiuQKuaZJriynXH/RySnal1Qi/wgO+joTFnWnhKBwzROgEMCDqDUhKLo8hTGQLerj54fm3MgZNI3aKZgnBtl/eUwRpT0+ypLA/KbxjsbKHxI532T3JiuCV+rn98O0+iPKQtskukywdfsORFJd+XrFpnzg/VupQNEVnnKT2Y7I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792055036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x8GQ9TqAFu5driuvo38kqzYt3n324pebOlaNmEELI+s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=iM2CAoG3ggHM0K4yPtAUU+xouFGzqcLVntPr6SMI+YIhYWWMAQYexfE1tad9duBFfNwqiugOTDzj2wKdmhquFDTY6leDKwHImAvUncATslW8xmpw3MiXbLSTKI4RrYzYxEiMl4ZzNwQ8cPIJNeQwsQpocZHxztS/gAcQ7LDb13E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dSRxo6US; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dSRxo6US" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C435D1F000C4; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:03:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792055035; bh=PJRu7W6/Or1we5Gv3BgoLEtby0D0Y0UGgfjBHfRc5+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dSRxo6USK3mc/4RQGRenUGQ8U2727f+oI3Ftl0yKjPBN568MCXCgNwmZSoGzysnUy JIRe4/X+X2uCl3WWgKXYzQtSUZWrDYBxZebGjtE75Purw0BPPWvfH5tGvd1dQcuRc8 Aa/DUUlmxLDBYgCQjPqxujc4t27+Lm3+HfRtD+6stCuut7mDBTAJczCJuA6dhdbd7w fJp/w0/hHaV7WPfPn9yqWBCXIzH3Zv1p5kejHg77+cJ6DtdiT07hujc8eIronx+gQE Dk50bYDtnGMmr8S8FeRuc04w8mj+WciTZAlEIkkaQ6KnP/2N9/uIFITb7oFOtXwQG3 zh3kwzX48f18g== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Xia Yan Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] veth: keep carrier off when resizing channels with a down peer Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 09:03:54 +0000 Message-ID: <179205503431.408196.3787158263559792614@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261015085821.12725-1-yana06070@163.com> References: <20261015085821.12725-1-yana06070@163.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.