From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788C651E422 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792068839; cv=none; b=qP8lLDYrnyekjjxjujLjd731MWKqf8cP61R2R9xwt5X+jYf2kH/l1HZGLBpeSaQh9En2EAs2jJJ/kWQFTMIs3NU6+GXy+4raPaptwv6pLImj5SpYomTr3cfnzj/CSk07FtnnC4n88JqGGW8+qNzb+fjNWmxRwAoGbo7q03g0lEQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792068839; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=TOSaOQjlD9I3JxJ58SWhkR/zF04dbsQFQ6/3BklZQnx4c8Jlst42VknwGxwNACr/pBLtE9wV/ksMCRvozKQy7IOCpAF37fuQU7VlnXLbznkl+gkwI6P4xrJTfMKFSU3jLJ+6n9FTe3WRzfD3TDUwv7+Qt0q8EtMW1RZZxZHGLyA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Zarm2UhP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Zarm2UhP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 676FC1F000C4; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:53:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792068838; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Zarm2UhP2RwUhZ73TLTGzzjHIJY7q2MnzsxUe9aXzFYIMtyKSeRLalTqhGwz5EpKC Mz87vK5BsvOF9hdyEAFLltcgMB/f06vlNf3RN3gWwbr5qrAXFPhrBioMeNYHcjdWT4 3BFWey2q9brTLQhtQDxINs0uorV1hAFTL60hvTN1Ug2KvuYggjyXHS9g9W0k5HDZFN xfnXpIRfvUNW96rd9ztI1pctTZz1Jt+p1SF6uYsgg7Vscb1gjNkOyrQleGWde4OAjC rDJeV6V7blrCKSGt8vCR1Y3+tdFyk8sWaa6HiylqmgfgPUqWnT5WUQ7kWuBi3LUGGG kBaXJZonJIjUg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, jesse@nicira.com, aatteka@nicira.com, horms@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, i.maximets@ovn.org, echaudro@redhat.com, aconole@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: openvswitch: skip IPv4 later fragments on TCP/UDP set actions Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:53:56 +0000 Message-ID: <179206883697.408196.1280247362935192335@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261015124749.4694-1-fmancera@suse.de> References: <20261015124749.4694-1-fmancera@suse.de> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.