From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B804F399D08; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792124091; cv=none; b=d9Sst7HPTeQfzXWcLFic9hubelJBTXisfNaSRVG//3HlJh2c41ndLH2+5qAqSuCKgNi6/SB/vW2wWgoQDUnGGeRQ1LtQeN1SLtHd7g/s5ffQweSk1X07AxWmTeC7oz7QPydwUzs3QF7wwZbD3MO+dq+ScsCakLocABUJ7Ja3Fio= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792124091; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=BejXm+nUJCmQ31DMNsYdQ8WXLfjvmXgZcu5Lsp1xTZVIj2HFcGnmhWtrSdWCbdvRG18ueKRlrQPtWqPy3x0uNODZ+jEo8/fEf8oxtqIfXa2dB3I9b50D64+IwjuQUVIPhANaKJ2W+1W2Y9wXigqRBMTyhiCWlmdJUcAVJoZ7vd4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gNLmKgTN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gNLmKgTN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 663FA1F000C4; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:14:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792124089; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=gNLmKgTNXe37Ju6OkYo0KlfVWQaaqVp3YmD/RFWSmVlt8mV2MBcIBtgQ6X3KAL1b1 G5sfUkO2x4CHEh9XD7946MCU2UGNR4La0D5ZZ0qyDFeNGSU/cXCjflFogQfwUMp6FO EoVQ4XAq0q/ZybpfWcu7PiBEwA6zEuCDnyfidRwQjJ3t2a0bW/vaLLpqIeqhkFA7Ts qs6VUCtT1I9GsCW7xQkid+gjWFsv4nKYCWvJrFKsIKM5BeOf6l1HcngarTmya0/H1i Nulv7fWWniIHwzFRBJcgnQnPtWHthU8wLpu+DI7CvSkWJH/yUqa4u+r+13EgnM2GBD CanD2O/rvOTPQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Liu Chao Cc: "David S . Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Chandrashekar Devegowda , Chiranjeevi Rapolu , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Johannes Berg , Liu Haijun , Loic Poulain , Paolo Abeni , Ricardo Martinez , Sergey Ryazanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: fix tx buffer release loop on invalid skb Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 04:14:47 +0000 Message-ID: <179212408791.408196.9351925971039548466@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261016041156.2295670-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com> References: <20261016041156.2295670-1-liuc63@xiaopeng.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.