From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1DA2DEA89; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 01:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792285399; cv=none; b=cepVGDBzsxuRLeWKWhxJpu8hLcg6W8/D1Du/9E0JJeDzgJgzcxx2NsjvcekuqpgRu0XtZzKoCm+6k65sWFM1f+tDw84HgdNCkb2eYuF7xa8Hu/PMJgQFEW/KNxbRk/nm16jDVsmc2P1JRQfARZqoTljno9y2E99KN2khW87elMg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792285399; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Qi2QUhGhq0lUTBMsbFo4scY1X9nHl/HBf523myE2/nCi/GE7XAZPv8hncFOaoUZCPKhxivkaXd1utAcEsX4a0gqeYxZ8lB1WiVk1hMv+x5V0Vfypx664m/cH6sH7LnbrMJdsc3s+J/M3QduhbTEAdqMpYd31x10H6YgcbXAprlI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iY67tuL8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iY67tuL8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF9531F000C5; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 01:03:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792285398; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=iY67tuL8Cl16KViBVt9cp7mnzWal93d6WEIKhYvoB28JknMRso1pipcHHjI2W7Tbs kBPdN+3Cv1GZ4nVW1/H651wMgtg6h1CfrBzEXPe6KKSjfJALP8YKUgKxieTqvRCDMO xQPCOlBd8mgwwK8chhMj9Y6pEW1OoCxHnLPEPamsuHJRO518nykhkZ4npdKY35+O1R DB96byy9a4FXa1/0w9LRv3IOxSlKGyM8Coau65Eh4Cijq03VaGY12sMsNYuEHlXGn/ s3nn/7mIHys88GvDV0ngdbAaoGzkd0hF4Ej2dW+91o5e6TleW9h0HsSDwc5nQW3mc5 MkXtUfkJwLoyw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/15] netfilter: disable br_netfilter in user namespaces Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 01:03:17 +0000 Message-ID: <179228539733.3290.12913693558354504063@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261018005638.1776148-2-pablo@netfilter.org> References: <20261018005638.1776148-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20261018005638.1776148-2-pablo@netfilter.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.