From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792488267; b=x2i7UZaD+/zeKKjd+VFXa/4+7+jKAqQrubU1O4ffJzo/5ZGYb0FSZErRZlag+Ff6eGRD taMHG1GNw/fgxuyLUjmJF8dNYTC0QPfaPoCZnbuvqh3Vq8/BrLO2lWZ8xuVO2We5ySKBC ib5iKm4uOcB4exhgkYMazWoXT+nQkGRD80evnvo2TlZRlBuCbi2+JthWnZGCZ1xhP7nR0 jrUHSBTxMYLEiH/ZyU7T3/qc/2TUHNs6VCGyZ0zD6hQ/1+ryxeBbDPvgQ7PoR+kuZe4Cd xe/UlllZ7VvqMYuhd3akPN7CB2FgRj9J6OdKi4JktsB4FJBSywQ1UP5ABTyqklbOBCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792488267; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=HPDU4wFGpZSpXzlh/OCt3qlLi0YoMeKdoPa1Qo+08eNVd+Zvx+EyOiMIG/YfzGBAR4SW 7d80aZ9PFCV02u1n42MDLd55bQ6NskWSIlBebt4iVo19DEG7oPpgXlRVZ0LoUzN0+P4ni xQprfJJmxpJos26daugpTS85QVclOL8pIGQw/HtM4kYiRa3HxjcsI9JAeXJsB5P1cHzU0 r9Bccvxd65CAs5LH2UBDbWgsMNuz7Wk/JgV2xZtahrkVoRmJoCCe7KzCh80PAvpus+t7b CGf2Q4UrxL1PIT+ddgxkZfzCaTWByKGeVAE26hlAuXk3KHRs3ZGeS4/CnJrK32H9Q4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=NMwLoyce; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043E7606A319; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=NMwLoyce Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7D361F000C4; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792488266; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NMwLoycej/ssvbx9ITmRXcNKM6CjL73IYWbfm1z778x8g6jo5t98RRcGulQFXzMfe a0nGgTc99yT6KQPhVnOa1LLzZlk6DogbKvXwDcreDZggxrkulyqapMFoZGH8a+sxnq McwgkO7AqtF+YzOa/n0oFe0molderu5QeYORlfw8lRJUIO5vD/KQFEuHGjN3lTTpLr YV1zUThVqdjKPNKQJIecY2ms8H5a9i7r94gukqFsptV/78S3FAFmI32DE+FhJ41x/M hQWxwSKkrsy6MESybEP64ffQKkyaPlGKtA7o1leXHSCX/tizgp6IiXJYl7iDWe9k36 rSpFGKXLH+pJw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Qingfang Deng Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Kees Cook , Simon Horman , Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada , Eric Woudstra , Felix Fietkau , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] pppoe: delete session hash entries by pointer match Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:24:25 +0000 Message-ID: <179248826539.3290.615848934021449047@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261020092118.47416-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> References: <20261020092118.47416-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.