From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792537994; b=jvkj5a0opzc1X3DELHDsZ/XfawJiaq71ybNkTOIQPBjiCG9xtgo9bYENoYT+hUjEdrMJ h+UPItTDCDSROoLG7gpC5ettCmEbvs0iaswOdGpDTi6+lndQf+v/UCiCjLRzYazsD8538 GJGHtNwx/27AW2oJIlDx0pYsTpgi2yUS1JFLKU0YI27dJJzAyfNVFEYGHfEFMML01CPDv CVUkpviw3W+MjJ1gUbfwV7MLlKniUfyOaZ5oxzFecU7D/ynq7uwh/4ble7V258g+DngW+ rSkrugfubSvxxHqOhMEMzwpd2qdWaJ0cAYSq+CPMjwk1pS/TUqXUM1bGXvmQACt7CAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792537994; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=NWxA24CytdwkdOrv03/wlm2TUhEJN7XqEV98/ODj8WDkZrusmQA2Q/c+lz0ZyDpLCmno jVupJbCNAGKlOUpdugonjtMs8yQ9pkbejoUVL60F1ON4FRGDILu5M1x3hDvhGdVxiK3QO f7PYjhubWO1r11k0zFDhEM5ntLKgfbbN8fBE4tPhOYZQoeXO4jM/j+CANlrFqa4X1H93u xtf2k+lfJRPa7Dw9I6o0yjgNulvgifzMExemZiFj7E/VdyR3suWwNme7u7aj4e3wZOxj+ jJd+5bXJ4kJjgIoauM3uiR0DrA3pYipAKt3zb9a7wLyuoGnm6PrEdaZ3e++0TDOBqSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="G9V3v/jp"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C4B606A31B; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=G9V3v/jp Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8DE71F000D0; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:13:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792537993; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=G9V3v/jp/KM+nkS/IAzzInf3E5uFZ1YnAFajQFVDhwn/pJ8pNTif6zcGBujvf7ZHN C03nOxjwhuqVaivQQIjb20SoMTEYxzxzU23G+ib2CZeAUKqsvaMRbGTjT3rhLCc2nz I1VGzXw6Ck2YtCSezvd1x2x6nkKHjigjWk4E1LqS9v0dONM1rKsQiWqF5C+j3uNZyN irfeaLrna8JHsb4V7UQE+fIS3YdKce0FzR6kf0U6LWfRZHbqIiRwCfd/2Bkpg1N4j4 z7EGzNoH8Zr6XS2y4JNLP4fGSCRH4/UftLRm1q/URKDsHBfIn5+jjAOC/GshBsqwep nz060x40b1cVQ== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Hungyu Lin Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dql: Reset the adjusted limit when resetting the queue Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:13:12 +0000 Message-ID: <179253799214.3290.9079364522070765674@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261020230358.6649-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> References: <20261020230358.6649-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.