From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792550373; b=1njvds61tMuQhJAwBEGRT0mt9yCbuh+DmFnixGyfw7dNElwSMzT2tSgY45K1mp6xDF/Q 0mQiIQa0wyj8VqXmb9ITkgUhoVWkpZlnzA3TaGK3SsbQ0w4TaZyrA2bT6llkB8I4N/k83 S20OODWBbb7zieG51SO9WsFzYFTPv/vBew2GO+IjEDBrJLRtMILf2TJW6aWWwgwxDF3Cw 99hOk5pWrKZ4cAsxTCtfkv9eU8jsg8gZkHjqu9h8ZNku5jYGysHMl1P8uOC9RPy+6iz/4 1YHZPlvqUo4ULdIzzF0nh4DBIZnKCchajZSzvXFxra1aRJ5WDFQZnRHRMlXPEsXFnrQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792550373; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=KfjeDLxq0Sb2eabTGvUtMocSZTpAhjxsLr7fdFj1f0ijHF51e8f6ylUGb8QHRGJcRTOI wev5MT+eVyMkZsk67D5Qxw+0RwwhuTVtdyTBDOKmoB6cekswWW5HaxYiOnOJAmN9/lVpE 7/eEeIiPqxrPPPXj1TfeI3rEcYVVMHOIg0UrAyA2yHP5Si4hQI4iPRREeI7VnOWJG0Gd2 dPG9qsFIotuZ3eBNXQf+DWJjYISkY2x/ffSXG9i7xJUVI8Iu9k1VAEnAjy9fNy59FYN6v uxnLT5igJNosD4hs3SH3aOdP7u4JsRWEUJFFHw/tN2Qmc2RXq6oesLiM4vSNvTYdMvA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aP3UlWGl; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1381606A320; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 02:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aP3UlWGl Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C979E1F000CC; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 02:39:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792550372; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aP3UlWGlcsxc17vwlZ0h9TUfJskO2KrZ1hiJjgBRaJeAsdwG4ya3iPVAhsKIwzo/Q 9F9Eznwnb1cxHkBCLSgeqSR+/bT0K+LuaaQ2//MSOM29L2+A7U6cZ47I05giNvUS+T 1kT97YZmXY8gVS9F/aavi9n938Znyk/VH5nkNPyKSclq/5vymZaWdSAr8U4oAQRR+q gejGdyBLSsFoCMFbYqc5yxgV3qzF30zMxDKn31lwSzX+tzGJ3FbXF+AK0n7qQnFTAt SblSRNqL9Q+zxKULhEPiVid69qTX6XjpxHlHDHoXiyX86s/XII5yZucErxSzQ5tZpy NvfB8EdIF6RaA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: ChunYuZhiQiang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, mkl@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] can: dev: can_fill_info(): don't wake up controller if interface is down Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 02:39:31 +0000 Message-ID: <179255037136.3290.7793994198845677922@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261021023334.11803-1-chunyuzhiqiang@yinhe.ht> References: <20261021023334.11803-1-chunyuzhiqiang@yinhe.ht> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.