From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792975330; b=IOkUIgz5dSv7JcwxvYWnGXOYi4TobxsNCS3O3RZLbep0JQKVuj1+Q22s4M54/puzLKBl DfE24tEmhDKWAk7M6lJGbKdX14n9Fo8mzFU7qJY0v9b9mV+dowdMsHgyjko3bwK9KFFnm geGfBA1yxHW8BqjUxZM/RdKEOFEz5U5+A7lEsp6nSVJ41NnYQF0kx9BiWq7G5auspWP9U 6AKf0jdg5+jKaY7QAmH1YB/zxYHVQOQDqroTXVoQDq2UNDl9i/pEtEJIc/dPIQcBvQStj cnxAqEvtDHNF8nM7El6IF13dBH02ghd+klDS+SL6Y/Suf3R2ph+yzAvn3pJo4B0ycHA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792975330; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; b=2ahewFzKFWxBTcMVIGXl10QU/WgI3WJ8YuHN11fa1L45PqfSPBt4g9P459yPKYvKDHdU HMwNj+ahzIjIaHpgl+TcgwdUE1ahCVJZx4ed+nUeXEC49dqQQyIRdTI+A9J+zJz9F+6+x FjQXCku5ET21/0DZTLu6ifmREEhy4T+UJX0V7UOGOB+gToQpilBAtBdRfAP65y7L7Nr/e gJQ8pHtb1YyBmRapP5PzrvYmgj7x8dQEgOkXQe4OPyhDJObpNBWNIgoVZuIwiVPdfSbWY BnG3xRHdAlxD1HAljiWVHLPmNl+gOe9JvVrwVXJ3L8cOupwr11n08lzJTev6yqinMMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=dFRyW9ci; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2169606A31B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=dFRyW9ci Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E89471F01825; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:42:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792975329; bh=ZCAoLYZlSrLohEk+mBrzJi43HvKosm2TxiN/tMhp9/s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=dFRyW9ci2rdPc4cif/kIGbi14Xk8LeVPM35rO2C9Pws1RzhGeRa4Qq1xm9BJMaEuN TVPwi/9R3jgAe/TJjAKSJHwQYOjrVX1b0Pt/hnmunxIrFB2nLOTgBd+jW3qgwOUO3v h8fOrkVDaDMYXbICA+dBYpp1ZMh26z65CEDkayqJEIKD1POms411k1otZE5VTbo4sS xkzB8hAles9xVB3JpAvpREmWg13VKfHZg8jpH7ovvfC/fr1bX7KWAZCoJCI79SFPfp Uc8mwMZj+e0U72sPb3Jfx6O5/0CIt4QomNOMStaNMKlaUmvmFWqW75IaZWnBgSAQEC QlAm9cSWOZsPA== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Hyunwoo Kim Cc: edumazet@kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, weiwan@google.com, sd@queasysnail.net, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 0/2] inet: fix lockless ehash walk races Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:42:08 +0000 Message-ID: <179297532848.3327.7260871340859769947@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261026003804.61923-1-imv4bel@gmail.com> References: <20261026003804.61923-1-imv4bel@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.