From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, kuniyu@google.com,
xeb@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, yana06070@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ip6_gre: fix changelink conflict checks for L2 tunnels
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2026 12:13:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179353522212.3131.3721818848581323546@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028115710.27806-1-yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider.
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 (1) · Low: 0
If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
(one such reply per series is enough).
- [Medium] Changelink on a non-collect_md L2 tunnel (ip6gretap/ip6erspan)
can now fail with -EEXIST because an L2 collect_md ("external") tunnel…
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but
ip6gre_changelink_common() calls ip6_tnl_encap_setup(nt, &ipencap)…
--
ip6_gre: fix changelink conflict checks for L2 tunnels
This patch changes the duplicate check in ip6gre_changelink_common().
It used ip6gre_tunnel_locate(net, p_p, 0), which only matches ARPHRD_IP6GRE
devices. It now uses ip6gre_tunnel_find(net, p_p, dev->type), so
ip6gretap and ip6erspan devices are checked against other L2 tunnels.
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> index b5d6ed8f0c369..df490798355de 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ ip6gre_changelink_common(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>
> ip6gre_netlink_parms(data, p_p);
>
> - t = ip6gre_tunnel_locate(net, p_p, 0);
> + t = ip6gre_tunnel_find(net, p_p, dev->type);
>
> if (t) {
> if (t->dev != dev)
[Severity: Medium]
Can this reject a valid changelink on a non-collect_md ip6gretap or
ip6erspan device when an "external" L2 tunnel has the same lookup key?
ip6gre_newlink() and ip6erspan_newlink() skip ip6gre_tunnel_find() for
collect_md devices. They still link those devices into the hash buckets:
net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:ip6gre_newlink() {
...
if (nt->parms.collect_md) {
if (rtnl_dereference(ign->collect_md_tun))
err = -EEXIST;
} else {
if (ip6gre_tunnel_find(net, &nt->parms, dev->type))
err = -EEXIST;
}
...
ip6gre_tunnel_link(net_generic(net, ip6gre_net_id), nt);
...
}
ip6gre_tunnel_find() does not check collect_md and stops at the first
match:
hlist_for_each_entry(t, head, hash_node) {
if (ipv6_addr_equal(local, &t->parms.laddr) &&
ipv6_addr_equal(remote, &t->parms.raddr) &&
key == t->parms.i_key &&
link == t->parms.link &&
type == t->dev->type)
break;
}
ip6gre_tunnel_link() uses hlist_add_head_rcu(), so the first match is the
tunnel that was linked most recently.
For example, create a wildcard ip6gretap device tap0 with no remote. Then
create "md0 type ip6gretap external". Both devices end up in the same
wildcard bucket with all-zero parameters and type ARPHRD_ETHER.
A later changelink on tap0 that only changes ttl would go:
ip6gre_changelink()
ip6gre_changelink_common()
ip6gre_tunnel_find(net, p_p, ARPHRD_ETHER) -> returns md0
t->dev != dev -> ERR_PTR(-EEXIST)
Before this patch the lookup used ARPHRD_IP6GRE, so md0 could not match
and the update went through. The same happens for ip6erspan, and between
ip6gretap and ip6erspan, since both use ARPHRD_ETHER.
The commit message says changelink now does what the newlink paths do.
Newlink never runs this lookup for collect_md devices, though. Should
changelink handle collect_md tunnels in these buckets in some way, for
example by skipping entries with t->parms.collect_md set?
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, not one introduced by this patch, but
the new EEXIST cases here make it reachable in more situations.
ip6gre_changelink_common() applies the encap attributes to the live tunnel
before the duplicate check and the unregistering check run:
net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c:ip6gre_changelink_common() {
...
if (ip6gre_netlink_encap_parms(data, &ipencap)) {
int err = ip6_tnl_encap_setup(nt, &ipencap);
if (err < 0)
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
ip6gre_netlink_parms(data, p_p);
t = ip6gre_tunnel_find(net, p_p, dev->type);
...
}
ip6_tnl_encap_setup() clears t->encap, then rewrites t->encap,
t->encap_hlen and t->hlen.
Suppose the lookup then returns another tunnel (-EEXIST), or the tunnel
is unregistering (-ENODEV). rtnl_changelink() returns that error with no
rollback:
err = ops->changelink(dev, tb, data, extack);
if (err < 0)
return err;
Could a rejected request that has IFLA_GRE_ENCAP_* attributes (for
example ENCAP_TYPE=NONE on a FOU/GUE tunnel) plus conflicting addresses
or key still change the tunnel's encapsulation? Would it make sense to
run the conflict checks before ip6_tnl_encap_setup()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261028115710.27806-1-yanxia%40cmss.chinamobile.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 11:57 [PATCH net] ip6_gre: fix changelink conflict checks for L2 tunnels Xia Yan
2026-10-30 15:16 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-10-31 2:44 ` Xia Yan
2026-11-01 12:13 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179353522212.3131.3721818848581323546@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xeb@mail.ru \
--cc=yana06070@163.com \
--cc=yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox