From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793581168; b=nO9aBFnVKuQcY3kjw6JDYhMYovMKd/OTzFDff6c/SoiWFitCg3JjEPDxDNJ+Qaksx7tH DxrLoDBWfGhquLZOdn7DyqtghyD4Yj1a8JSl8lp65Y1eINNFW6GfYjxrg6rHgbm0aBbvs QZVomC48z1LbPtR2MoisinQHVGeE9raYqULc/ZRbJ2lg+JuulwB07k4YhpwqajD3CWWie lAgZ5SO/J/oRJzn2iU60FV3zvexzreo/oJp4KrljGVM+v5Rob3oksDqrLG0w88zQrxuUZ Y3qUaYfWGYKonnhKRabAZDrRhPWIJpcLE62uTX96WhXd5rTqBZrh4L6ExXCUQtvJfUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793581168; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:Auto-Submitted:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; b=ghmT0G33ItcHIPHurqROoOfH1GlAVqtCJOo5wHV665r8033q6E6BDxpctZIHnjcu2cJr PLXpNNvEaZPFYoU8//p183lxZvS+5EX4/lXJ6SVzt2dclX3xLQWiEBUVa+lzk0fCgdPeU kvOstWXgw1Kxf54QTiNlQQRV7ziK1dmyreqXp8c7P7xOSF4GByWKqILjt5waNxVkFTsXv FEDlCs9rKT34t+aFMiT65Qhux1/JEOJVvgzMZTEmY36IK31+4XoIgveGjSW4PgpFCsFVh UnwyU6E1Zc3V3asmEH/vkDdyRt5XoPkNI9dNmWEjlPPps4Wa8bJzupPUXSvsEBKfkQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aNqP0Npd; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB87606A324; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 00:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=aNqP0Npd Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A7F1F000C1; Mon, 2 Nov 2026 00:59:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793581167; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=aNqP0NpdWdBZHEnwX/xsdBX1tsQAOtoeqoL1gb57Daqn61DXwkRqJEbrqSw8Em9pp 4xx2KGNuByW5bCkF98khxnCAbAK8Pv+dT3RCYsaIHuZtRRVQHTd5Hk9TrAhZAJtjxr ZtuVD0HujGzpoJKQssG+XDZ2a+8qpR+0jG9DoSomzXj+/MWdhP6qS1bQtF2F5Bl+ko BJ/eLXVtFJSAq50+kKhjjcUowLSIQWLehvDyJ3WSFCZ+m4IfzqSn7AJIFkbEt4Jpbs 8Nxe0bLYg7WAoRNnMIR9Q3xDln1hfccKc3NfK4nFeT0meQ6DDl5nbCvqW6Njyh5tkm n+/7JvKaAIqAw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH net 01/15] netfilter: nft_reject: prevent unbounded recursion in output hooks Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:59:26 +0000 Message-ID: <179358116673.3286.17229865634602635672@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261102005654.532438-2-pablo@netfilter.org> References: <20261102005654.532438-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20261102005654.532438-2-pablo@netfilter.org> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.